Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

blocksim - increase http client transport settings #597

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Apr 11, 2024

Conversation

metachris
Copy link
Collaborator

πŸ“ Summary

Improve HTTP client transport settings for forwarding blocks to simulation


βœ… I have run these commands

  • make lint
  • make test-race
  • go mod tidy
  • I have seen and agree to CONTRIBUTING.md

@codecov-commenter
Copy link

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests βœ…

Project coverage is 30.62%. Comparing base (fd95e0c) to head (ff1234b).

❗ Your organization needs to install the Codecov GitHub app to enable full functionality.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main     #597      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   30.55%   30.62%   +0.06%     
==========================================
  Files          41       41              
  Lines        6286     6292       +6     
==========================================
+ Hits         1921     1927       +6     
  Misses       4118     4118              
  Partials      247      247              
Flag Coverage Ξ”
unittests 30.62% <100.00%> (+0.06%) ⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

β˜” View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
πŸ“’ Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@metachris metachris merged commit 0274085 into main Apr 11, 2024
4 checks passed
@metachris metachris deleted the blocksim-httpclient branch April 11, 2024 18:52
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants