Skip to content

Conversation

@Dmytro-Melnyshyn
Copy link
Contributor

@Dmytro-Melnyshyn Dmytro-Melnyshyn commented Feb 9, 2026

Purpose

Add the Users custom fields to display at Check out multi-select field to the Other settings. The selected custom fields will be displayed in the user and proxy user details in the Checkout app.

Approach

Refs

https://folio-org.atlassian.net/browse/UICIRC-1091

Screenshots

2026-02-09_09h20_14.mp4

Pre-Merge Checklist

Before merging this PR, please go through the following list and take appropriate actions.

  • I've added appropriate record to the CHANGELOG.md
  • Does this PR meet or exceed the expected quality standards?
    • Code coverage on new code is 80% or greater
    • Duplications on new code is 3% or less
    • There are no major code smells or security issues
  • Does this introduce breaking changes?
    • If any API-related changes - okapi interfaces and permissions are reviewed/changed correspondingly
    • There are no breaking changes in this PR.

If there are breaking changes, please STOP and consider the following:

  • What other modules will these changes impact?
  • Do JIRAs exist to update the impacted modules?
    • If not, please create them
    • Do they contain the appropriate level of detail? Which endpoints/schemas changed, etc.
    • Do they have all they appropriate links to blocked/related issues?
  • Are the JIRAs under active development?
    • If not, contact the project's PO and make sure they're aware of the urgency.
  • Do PRs exist for these changes?
    • If so, have they been approved?

Ideally all of the PRs involved in breaking changes would be merged in the same day to avoid breaking the folio-testing environment. Communication is paramount if that is to be achieved, especially as the number of intermodule and inter-team dependencies increase.

While it's helpful for reviewers to help identify potential problems, ensuring that it's safe to merge is ultimately the responsibility of the PR assignee.

@github-actions
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Feb 9, 2026

Jest Unit Test Results

    1 files  ±0    188 suites  ±0   1m 17s ⏱️ -5s
2 002 tests +3  2 002 ✅ +3  0 💤 ±0  0 ❌ ±0 
2 049 runs  +3  2 049 ✅ +3  0 💤 ±0  0 ❌ ±0 

Results for commit e4f43a3. ± Comparison against base commit 7d27072.

♻️ This comment has been updated with latest results.

@sonarqubecloud
Copy link

sonarqubecloud bot commented Feb 9, 2026

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants