Skip to content

Conversation

@twiggler
Copy link
Contributor

@twiggler twiggler commented Oct 8, 2025

No description provided.

@twiggler twiggler requested a review from Miauwkeru October 8, 2025 12:36
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Oct 8, 2025

Codecov Report

❌ Patch coverage is 10.00000% with 9 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.
✅ Project coverage is 44.90%. Comparing base (7dbd015) to head (8979652).
⚠️ Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Files with missing lines Patch % Lines
acquire/acquire.py 10.00% 9 Missing ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main     #272      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   44.81%   44.90%   +0.08%     
==========================================
  Files          26       26              
  Lines        3541     3543       +2     
==========================================
+ Hits         1587     1591       +4     
+ Misses       1954     1952       -2     
Flag Coverage Δ
unittests 44.90% <10.00%> (+0.08%) ⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

else:
with context_mgr:
for target in Target.open_all(target_paths):
target_name = "Unknown" # overwrite previous target name
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think this line can be removed no?

Copy link
Contributor

@Miauwkeru Miauwkeru Oct 13, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

nvm, it is there so we do not reuse the previous target_name in case target.name fails

@twiggler twiggler merged commit ca78bce into main Oct 15, 2025
20 of 23 checks passed
@twiggler twiggler deleted the esxi-memory branch October 15, 2025 12:00
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants