You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Your fields mask for the computation of the ICRC is wrong.
I believe that the ICRC masked fields these are related to the RoCEv1 specification [1]. In fact here we can find the masked field for the GRH (traffic class, flow label and hop limit).
RoCEv2 ICRC specification can be found here [2].
The computation itself cannot run at 100 Gbps, in fact the unrolled loop cannot be pipelined efficiently, implementing the RoCEv2 IP with the ICRC enabled will cause a WNS of ~60 ns (10 times the clock period).
Your fields mask for the computation of the ICRC is wrong.
I believe that the ICRC masked fields these are related to the RoCEv1 specification [1]. In fact here we can find the masked field for the GRH (traffic class, flow label and hop limit).
RoCEv2 ICRC specification can be found here [2].
The computation itself cannot run at 100 Gbps, in fact the unrolled loop cannot be pipelined efficiently, implementing the RoCEv2 IP with the ICRC enabled will cause a WNS of ~60 ns (10 times the clock period).
[1] InfiniBand Architecture Specification Volume 1 Release 1.4 Pg. 1913 (RoCEv1), Pg. 218 (Infiniband ICRC)
[2] InfiniBand Architecture Specification Volume 1 Release 1.4 Pg. 1935-1936
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: