-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
feat/ci: add build CI workflow #5
Conversation
Signed-off-by: Brenden Freier <iam@baconi.ng>
WalkthroughThis pull request adds a new GitHub Actions workflow that automates the build process. The workflow is triggered on pushes and pull requests to the Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)sequenceDiagram
participant Developer as Developer
participant GH as GitHub Actions
participant Container as Docker Container
Developer->>GH: Push/P.R. to master
GH->>GH: Trigger build workflow
GH->>GH: Checkout repository (actions/checkout)
GH->>GH: Configure Git safe directories
GH->>GH: Set execute permissions for gradlew
GH->>Container: Run build command (./gradlew build)
Container-->>GH: Return build/test results
GH->>Developer: Deliver build results
Poem
📜 Recent review detailsConfiguration used: CodeRabbit UI 📒 Files selected for processing (1)
🔇 Additional comments (6)
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
@coderabbitai review |
✅ Actions performedReview triggered.
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
lgtm. yml still sucks as a format though.
Make the build not fail though. Not sure what exactly its issue is. Maybe its expecting something that's being .gitignore'd ? |
there was a breaking change in a new wpilib version (see f411d8a), which was updated by dependabot and never got fixed (proof we need build checks lol) |
(it was also a problem with 8206cc2 lol) |
Summary by CodeRabbit