-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 526
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Re-add Changes Lost From #4272 #4288
base: master
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
Paket Lock Diff ReportThis report was generated via Paket Lock Diff Additions - (0)Removals - (5)
Version Upgrades - (2)
Version Downgrades - (0) |
I believe these changes should be good to go. The failing tests seemed normal as mentioned in the discussion on #4272. Let me know if I can update anything else 😄 |
@1eyewonder, could you check those:
Thanks for the updates. |
@smoothdeveloper Sorry, I had VSCode set to format on save! Made all the necessary changes. Good call on the framework restrictions 😎 |
Actually spoke too soon. Looking into some errors |
e252450
to
6323f88
Compare
Sorry, framework restrictions work without
|
…n --clean-redirects`
@smoothdeveloper It appears adding the framework restrictions and removing the Newtonsoft redirect is causing build issues on the build server. Have any ideas as to what the errors could mean? I'm interpreting this as a FAKE build issue but I could be wrong |
Does it work to set a framework restriction of |
@Numpsy, AFAIU, it is about the package resolution that relies only on package metadata; not reliant on the runtime paket executable is running. I need to look at the branch again and see if the tweaks I suggested are worth anything / what is causing the issue with CI. |
This PR is re-adding some code that was lost from #4272 when code was getting bumped for various v9 things. If this code was purposefully removed, feel free to close this PR but I didn't see anything obvious as to why it may have been removed. I figured I would keep it at
net8
for now since that was previously approved. We can then work on doing any net9 updates desired in later PRs