feat: Add GitHub PR Checks Workflow #86
Conversation
WalkthroughThe changes introduce a new configuration for pull request (PR) checks in the GitHub repository. This includes a Changes
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
|
will wait for clickup removal - removing request for now |
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (2)
- .github/pr-checks-config.yml (1 hunks)
- .github/workflows/pr-checks.yml (1 hunks)
Additional comments not posted (6)
.github/pr-checks-config.yml (1)
1-5: LGTM!The
prefix_checkconfiguration enforces a standardized format for PR titles, which is a good practice. The allowed prefixes cover common types of changes and the case-insensitive match provides flexibility while maintaining consistency. Themessage_if_not_matchingclearly communicates the expected format to contributors.Standardizing PR titles improves clarity and helps in organizing and tracking changes effectively.
.github/workflows/pr-checks.yml (5)
2-2: LGTM!The workflow name is clear and descriptive of its purpose.
4-6: LGTM!The events that trigger the workflow are appropriate for a PR checks workflow.
8-10: LGTM!The permissions are appropriate for a PR checks workflow that needs to write PR comments and read the repository contents.
12-14: LGTM!The job name is clear and descriptive of its purpose. Running the job on the latest Ubuntu is a good practice to ensure the latest features and security updates.
15-20: Verify the security and reliability of thefylein/fyle-pr-actionrepository.Using an action from a third-party repository could introduce security risks if the action is not well-maintained or has vulnerabilities. Please ensure that the
fylein/fyle-pr-actionrepository is secure, reliable, and actively maintained before using it in the workflow.Run the following script to verify the security and reliability of the
fylein/fyle-pr-actionrepository:Consider using a variable for the configuration file path.
The configuration file path is hardcoded, which could be problematic if the file is moved or renamed. Consider using a variable for the configuration file path to make the workflow more flexible and maintainable.
Apply this diff to use a variable for the configuration file path:
name: Strong PR Checks on: pull_request: types: [opened, synchronize, edited] permissions: pull-requests: write contents: read +env: + PR_CHECKS_CONFIG_FILE: .github/pr-checks-config.yml jobs: pr_checks: runs-on: ubuntu-latest steps: - name: Run strong checks uses: fylein/fyle-pr-action@v1 with: github-token: ${{ secrets.GITHUB_TOKEN }} - config-file: .github/pr-checks-config.yml + config-file: ${{ env.PR_CHECKS_CONFIG_FILE }}
.github/pr-checks-config.yml
Outdated
| description: | ||
| - name: 'clickup_check' | ||
| regex: '(?i)app.clickup.com' | ||
| message_if_not_matching: 'PR description must contain a link to a ClickUp (case-insensitive)' |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Consider making the ClickUp link optional based on the nature of the change.
While including a link to relevant ClickUp tasks in the PR description can improve tracking and provide context, strictly mandating it for all PRs may not be ideal. Some changes, such as small bug fixes, documentation updates, or minor refactors, may not necessarily warrant a ClickUp reference.
Blocking PRs solely due to the absence of a ClickUp link could potentially discourage valuable contributions. Instead, consider making the ClickUp link optional and encourage its inclusion for major features, significant changes, or when additional context is crucial for understanding the PR.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
.github/pr_checks_config.yml (1)
7-10: Consider making the ClickUp link optional.The
clickup_checkfor the PR description is well-defined:
- The case-insensitive regex allows for flexibility.
- The error message is clear about the expectation of a ClickUp link.
This will ensure that PRs are linked to a ClickUp task. However, consider the following:
- There might be valid reasons for a PR to not have a ClickUp link, such as a quick fix or a docs update.
- Making the ClickUp link mandatory might discourage contributors from submitting small PRs.
Consider making the ClickUp link optional by adjusting the configuration:
description: - name: 'clickup_check' regex: '(?i)app.clickup.com' - message_if_not_matching: 'PR description must contain a link to a ClickUp (case-insensitive)' + message_if_not_matching: 'PR description should ideally contain a link to a ClickUp task (case-insensitive)' + required: false
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (2)
- .github/pr_checks_config.yml (1 hunks)
- .github/workflows/pr_checks.yml (1 hunks)
Additional comments not posted (2)
.github/pr_checks_config.yml (1)
1-5: LGTM!The
prefix_checkfor the PR title is well-defined:
- The case-insensitive regex allows for flexibility.
- The allowed prefixes cover common types of changes.
- The error message is clear about the expected format.
This will enforce a consistent naming convention for PR titles.
.github/workflows/pr_checks.yml (1)
1-19: LGTM! The workflow configuration looks good.The workflow is well-structured and follows best practices:
- The name and trigger events are appropriately defined.
- The permissions are correctly set for the required access.
- The job configuration is valid, running on the latest Ubuntu version.
- The use of an external action leverages existing functionality.
- The action is properly configured with the necessary parameters.
This workflow will enhance the quality assurance process by automating checks on pull requests, helping maintain code quality and catch potential issues early.
https://app.clickup.com
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Bug Fixes