siLOH is a Docker-based pipeline for analysing Loss of Heterozygosity (LOH) from NGS data. The pipeline integrates samtools, VarScan2, and a custom Python analysis script to identify potential regions of Loss of Heterozygosity (LOH).
The siLOH pipeline uses a targeted approach to identify candidate LOH regions by analysing the allele frequencies of predefined common SNPs (curated SNPs from dbSNP with Minor Allele Frequency (MAF) ≥ 30%) across the capture regions contained within an input BAM file.
This tool is designed for research use and preliminary screening purposes only. Results should be considered indicative rather than diagnostic:
- All LOH findings should be confirmed using validated diagnostic methods
- Negative results do not rule out the presence of LOH
- The tool is optimised for specificity over sensitivity to minimise false positives
- Results should be interpreted in conjunction with other clinical and laboratory findings
- This tool should not be used as the sole basis for diagnostic or treatment decisions
For clinical applications, follow-up testing using validated diagnostic methods (such as SNP arrays, microsatellite analysis, or targeted sequencing) is required to confirm any findings.
flowchart TD
%% External inputs
A[Input BAM File]
C[Reference Genome]
subgraph "Docker Container"
direction TB
subgraph "Built-in Resources"
B[MAF30 SNPs List]
cent[Centromeres.json]
bed[Gene BED File]
end
subgraph "Step 1: Variant Calling"
D[Samtools mpileup]
E[VarScan2 pileup2cns]
F[Raw Variants at SNP Sites]
end
subgraph "Step 2: LOH Analysis"
G[Analyze Variant Frequencies]
H{Is Position Homozygous?<br/>≤35% or ≥65%}
I[Build Region Streak]
J{Region Criteria Met?}
K[Split at Centromeres]
end
subgraph "Step 3: Filtering & Output"
L{Final Region Filters}
M[Gene Annotation]
end
end
%% Output file
N[LOH Report CSV]
%% Connections outside Docker
A --> D
C --> D
M --> N
%% Connections inside Docker
B --> D
D --> E
E --> F
F --> G
G --> H
H -->|Yes| I
H -->|No| G
I --> J
J -->|No| G
J -->|"Yes<br/>≥5 homozygous sites<br/>≥1Mb size"| K
K --> L
cent --> K
L -->|"Pass:<br/>≥40 homozygous<br/>>90% confidence<br/>non-X chromosome"| M
bed --> M
%% Styling
classDef input fill:#e3f2fd,stroke:#1565c0
classDef docker fill:#f5f5f5,stroke:#424242,stroke-width:2px
classDef resource fill:#e8eaf6,stroke:#3949ab
classDef process fill:#f5f5f5,stroke:#424242
classDef decision fill:#fff3e0,stroke:#ef6c00
classDef output fill:#e8f5e9,stroke:#2e7d32
class A,C input
class B,cent,bed resource
class D,E,F,G,I,K,M process
class H,J,L decision
class N output
- Pileup Generation: Uses samtools mpileup to generate pileup data at specified positions
- Variant Calling: VarScan2 analyzes the pileup to identify variants
- LOH Analysis: Custom Python script processes variants to identify LOH regions
- Output Generation: Results are saved in CSV format
- Docker installed and running
- Input BAM files
- Reference genome (ucsc_hg19.fa)
- BED file containing regions of interest
- Sufficient disk space for analysis
- Clone the repository:
git clone https://github.com/g-pyxl/siLOH.git
cd siLOH
- Build the Docker image:
docker build -t siloh .
The pipeline expects the following files:
- Reference Genome:
ref/ucsc_hg19.fa
(GRCh37 example) - Sample BAM Files: Contig naming should follow "chr1" format
- BED File:
beds/R210.bed
- The pipeline comes provided with an R210.bed designed for Lynch Syndrome calling. Tool can be ran with or without BED file calling. - maf30.txt: Over 1.8m SNPs with high MAF, curated from dbSNP
- centromeres.json: Centromere positions relative to GRCh37 (provided in repo)
siLOH/
├── Dockerfile
├── requirements.txt
├── run_analysis.sh
├── loh.py
├── maf30.txt
├── centromeres.json
├── ref/
│ └── ucsc_hg19.fa
├── samples/
│ └── your_sample.bam
├── results/
└── beds/
└── R210.bed
- Run the analysis:
docker run -v /path/to/ref:/app/ref \
-v /path/to/samples:/app/samples \
-v /path/to/results:/app/results \
-v /path/to/beds:/app/beds \
siloh your_sample_name
Replace /path/to/
with your actual paths and your_sample_name
with your BAM filename (without the .bam extension).
The pipeline generates the following files in the results directory:
{sample}.pileup
: Raw pileup data{sample}.cns
: VarScan2 consensus output{sample}.loh.csv
: Final LOH analysis results
The LOH CSV file contains:
- Chromosome
- Start position
- End position
- Affected genes (if BED file provided)
To enter the container without running the analysis:
docker run -it --entrypoint=/bin/bash siloh
- Memory: Depends on input BAM file size
- Disk Space: ~3x the size of input BAM file
- CPU: Single-threaded processing
- Currently supports hg19 reference genome
- Single-sample processing
- Requires sorted, indexed BAM files - .bai should be within same directory as BAM
- Employs a high-specificity approach that trades sensitivity for reliability:
- Designed for expedited screening rather than comprehensive LOH detection
- Will only detect more obvious/extensive LOH regions to minimize false positives
- May miss subtle or complex LOH events that would be detected by traditional methods
- Less sensitive than traditional non-NGS methods like SNP arrays or microsatellite analysis
This tool incorporates several open-source tools and methodological approaches that should be cited:
-
Li H, Handsaker B, Wysoker A, et al. The Sequence Alignment/Map format and SAMtools. Bioinformatics. 2009;25(16):2078-2079. doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btp352
-
Koboldt DC, Zhang Q, Larson DE, et al. VarScan 2: somatic mutation and copy number alteration discovery in cancer by exome sequencing. Genome Res. 2012;22(3):568-576. doi:10.1101/gr.129684.111
-
Tuna M, Knuutila S, Mills GB. Uniparental disomy in cancer. Trends Mol Med. 2009;15(3):120-128. doi:10.1016/j.molmed.2009.01.005
-
Ryland GL, Doyle MA, Goode D, et al. Loss of heterozygosity: what is it good for? BMC Med Genomics. 2015;8:45. doi:10.1186/s12920-015-0123-z
For comparison with traditional approaches:
-
Takahashi S, Fukuda M, Mitani Y, et al. Microsatellite instability and LOH studies for assessment of mismatch repair deficiency in colorectal cancer. Methods Mol Biol. 2021;2265:147-162. doi:10.1007/978-1-0716-1209-5_11
-
González S, Jover L, Mila M, et al. Cost-effectiveness Analysis Comparing Different Techniques for MSI and LOH Studies in Lynch Syndrome Diagnosis. Appl Immunohistochem Mol Morphol. 2017;25(10):720-727. doi:10.1097/PAI.0000000000000370