Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

sci-physics/openloops: offer processes #1307

Closed
wants to merge 5 commits into from

Conversation

APN-Pucky
Copy link
Contributor

@APN-Pucky APN-Pucky commented Dec 12, 2024

I mirror the processes sources on gitlab that could/are otherwise downloaded from https://www.physik.uzh.ch/data/openloops/repositories/public/processes/2/, but it offers only the latest version and changes over time.
Other tools will require that these libraries are installed.

Changes and things to think about:

  • Should it use USE_EXPAND?
  • Instead of using USE flags one could just always install all (or a subset) unconditionally?
  • procdir is now the system library dir. This is possibly dangerous when one calls as root openloops clean and it would wipe the /usr/lib*/ folder thinking it is just the procdir openloops clean only runs rm -rf proclib.

Signed-off-by: Alexander Puck Neuwirth <alexander@neuwirth-informatik.de>
@APN-Pucky APN-Pucky changed the title sci-physics/openloops: update SRC_URI sci-physics/openloops: offer processes Dec 12, 2024
Signed-off-by: Alexander Puck Neuwirth <alexander@neuwirth-informatik.de>
Signed-off-by: Alexander Puck Neuwirth <alexander@neuwirth-informatik.de>
Signed-off-by: Alexander Puck Neuwirth <alexander@neuwirth-informatik.de>
@APN-Pucky APN-Pucky marked this pull request as ready for review December 12, 2024 14:09
Signed-off-by: Alexander Puck Neuwirth <alexander@neuwirth-informatik.de>
@APN-Pucky
Copy link
Contributor Author

Thanks, closed per d180ae1 and following.

@APN-Pucky APN-Pucky closed this Dec 12, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants