docs: Refine 'What is Spec-Driven Development?' section in README #610
+9
−1
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Hello team,
This pull request proposes a revision to the "What is Spec-Driven Development?" section of the README to strengthen the project's core message.
This change is not just a stylistic update; it's a strategic improvement to the project's positioning.
Why This Change Matters
This revision makes the introduction more powerful on three key fronts:
Adds Historical Credibility: It frames
spec-kit
as the modern revival of a proven, time-tested discipline. This resonates strongly with experienced engineers and provides valuable context for all developers, positioning the project as a mature, serious solution rather than a fleeting trend.Improves Technical Precision: It corrects the potentially misleading phrase "specifications become executable." The new text clarifies the true relationship: the spec is the authoritative source from which AI generates the executable code. This accuracy is vital for managing expectations and building long-term trust with our users.
Strengthens Project Positioning: By grounding the project in engineering fundamentals and using precise language, we move the narrative away from potential "AI hype" and towards professional rigour. This tone is crucial for widespread adoption and credibility within the technical community.
In short, this change helps transform the introduction from a simple explanation into a compelling and accurate manifesto that honors our industry's past while confidently looking to its future.
Happy to discuss any feedback.
Ning