Refactor: extract block executor service, deduplicate connection tests, clean up repo artifacts #90
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Codebase structure analysis identified a 2700-line endpoint file mixing routing with business logic, duplicated TCP connection test code across 5 block types, repeated API base URL constants across 7 frontend services, and ~10K lines of committed log/db/backup artifacts.
Backend: service extraction
execute_block(), models, and expression evaluators fromworkflows.pyintobackend/app/services/block_executor.pyworkflows.py: 2704 → 754 lines — now purely route definitions_tcp_connection_test():socket,time,re,subprocess,xml.etree) moved to module-levelFrontend: shared API config
frontend/src/services/apiConfig.tsas single source of truth forAPI_BASE_URLBlockNode.tsx.bak(347 lines)Repo hygiene
.gitignore: added*.log,*.db,*.bakpatternstest.db, timestamped script copiesOriginal prompt
✨ Let Copilot coding agent set things up for you — coding agent works faster and does higher quality work when set up for your repo.