-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
chore: cleanup exports #34
Conversation
🦋 Changeset detectedLatest commit: 9b886cc The changes in this PR will be included in the next version bump. This PR includes changesets to release 1 package
Not sure what this means? Click here to learn what changesets are. Click here if you're a maintainer who wants to add another changeset to this PR |
035bc39
to
9725795
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Need to make sure that the README is also updated to these exports.
9725795
to
add1f17
Compare
@baiirun I updated the readme 👍 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Approved but had a question on whether we should go ahead and add a namespace for the base58 utilities.
Note that these are pretty breaking changes and we already have a few repos relying on this package. Namely the web app and the hackathon template. I'll update those once this gets merged in and a new version published.
index.ts
Outdated
|
||
/** | ||
* This module provides utility functions for working with base58 ids | ||
* in TypeScript. | ||
* | ||
* @since 0.0.6 | ||
*/ | ||
export { BASE58_ALLOWED_CHARS, decodeBase58ToUUID, encodeBase58 } from './src/core/base58.js'; | ||
export { decodeBase58ToUUID, encodeBase58 } from './src/core/base58.js'; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Does it make sense to Namespace these as part of this PR?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
agreed, just added a commit. In this case I think it's also fine to expose BASE58_ALLOWED_CHARS
No description provided.