Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

docs: update Policy and Graph Explorer verbiage in teleport-policy guide #50412

Draft
wants to merge 2 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

mmcallister
Copy link
Contributor

For update request via #50411.
Changes made in the admin-guides/teleport-policy pages; I'll go through the rest of the doc and update as well if these edits look ok.

cc @roraback

Copy link

🤖 Vercel preview here: https://docs-i54z7vtx4-goteleport.vercel.app/docs

- For self-hosted clusters, a running Access Graph node v1.24.0 or later.
Check [Access Graph page](teleport-policy.mdx) for details on
how to set up Access Graph.
- For self-hosted clusters, a running Graph Explorer node v1.24.0 or later.
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Technically we run access graph service for Teleport Policy https://gallery.ecr.aws/gravitational/access-graph

@@ -95,16 +94,16 @@ it's possible to reuse it as long as the following requirements are met:

- On step 2, you match the `discovery_group` with the existing Discovery Service's
`discovery_group`.
- Access Graph service is reachable from the machine where Discovery Service runs.
- Graph Explorer service is reachable from the machine where Discovery Service runs.
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Most of this is good, but I would note again that we run the access graph service for this.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Do you suggest a different way to phrase this? The req for this was to change 'access graph' to Graph Explorer since that's what it is now called in the UI. I think you are saying access graph is what is powering Explorer, but I don't want to confused users.

Copy link

github-actions bot commented Jan 10, 2025

Amplify deployment status

Branch Commit Job ID Status Preview Updated (UTC)
policy-and-graph-changes HEAD 1 ✅SUCCEED policy-and-graph-changes 2025-01-10 03:10:05

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

docs: update Policy and Graph Explorer verbiage
2 participants