Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update action.md #582

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Oct 7, 2024
Merged

Update action.md #582

merged 2 commits into from
Oct 7, 2024

Conversation

jwillemsen
Copy link
Contributor

Updated action version

Updated action version
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Oct 6, 2024

📝 Walkthrough
📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

The documentation for the GitHub Action has been updated to reflect a version change in the actions/checkout action from v3 to v4. This change impacts the workflow configuration specifically during the repository checkout step in the validation process. While the version number has changed, the overall structure and purpose of the documentation remain intact, continuing to guide users on setting up and utilizing the GitHub Action for validating repositories with HACS.

Changes

File Change Summary
.github/workflows/validate.yml Updated actions/checkout version from v3 to v4.
source/docs/publish/action.md Documentation updated to reflect the version change of actions/checkout.

Sequence Diagram(s)

sequenceDiagram
    participant User
    participant GitHub Action
    participant Repository

    User->>GitHub Action: Trigger validation
    GitHub Action->>Repository: Checkout code (v4)
    Repository-->>GitHub Action: Code checked out
    GitHub Action->>User: Validation results
Loading

📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: ASSERTIVE

📥 Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between e112323 and bbd622c.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • source/docs/publish/action.md (0 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (1)
  • source/docs/publish/action.md

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

‼️ IMPORTANT
Auto-reply has been disabled for this repository in the CodeRabbit settings. The CodeRabbit bot will not respond to your replies unless it is explicitly tagged.

  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Outside diff range comments (1)
source/docs/publish/action.md (1)

Line range hint 1-52: Let's sprinkle some wisdom on this documentation sundae! 🍨

While we're in the neighborhood, how about we add a little nugget of knowledge? It might be helpful to mention the importance of keeping actions up-to-date. We could add something like this after the code block:

!!! tip "Stay up-to-date"
    It's a good practice to periodically check and update the versions of actions used in your workflows. This ensures you have the latest features and security updates.

What do you think? It's like adding sprinkles to our documentation sundae - not necessary, but it makes it that much sweeter! 🍬

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: ASSERTIVE

📥 Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between d6a5f6c and e112323.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • source/docs/publish/action.md (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🔇 Additional comments (2)
source/docs/publish/action.md (2)

Line range hint 1-52: Well, butter my biscuit! This documentation is looking mighty fine! 🍯🥖

Overall, this update is smoother than a fresh jar of skippy. The version bump keeps things current, and the rest of the document is as clear as a bell on a frosty morning.

Keep up the great work! You're making documentation great again, one markdown file at a time. 📚✨


43-43: Woohoo! We're moving up in the world of actions! 🎉

Great job updating the actions/checkout action to v4! It's like giving your workflow a shiny new pair of shoes. This change keeps your action fresh and potentially brings in new features or improvements.

Let's make sure we didn't miss any other mentions of the old version. I'll put on my detective hat and investigate! 🕵️‍♂️

P.S. If this action were a pizza, we just added extra cheese. Yum! 🍕

✅ Verification successful

All Clear! 🚀

Fantastic work! 🥳 We've scoured the docs and confirmed that there are no lingering actions/checkout@v3 references. Your upgrade to v4 is spot on and everything looks shiny and up-to-date!

Keep rocking those updates! 🤘

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for any remaining mentions of actions/checkout@v3

echo "Searching for any lingering v3 mentions..."
rg --type md "actions/checkout@v3"

echo "Double-checking our v4 update..."
rg --type md "actions/checkout@v4"

Length of output: 305

source/docs/publish/action.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
Co-authored-by: Joakim Sørensen <joasoe@gmail.com>
@jwillemsen jwillemsen requested a review from ludeeus October 7, 2024 09:10
@ludeeus ludeeus merged commit 1fe1e53 into hacs:main Oct 7, 2024
3 checks passed
@jwillemsen jwillemsen deleted the patch-1 branch October 7, 2024 09:23
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants