Closed
Conversation
![github-advanced-security[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/57789?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
rvhonorato
added
the
CI / repository
amjjbonvin
approved these changes
Sep 4, 2025
Member
amjjbonvin
left a comment
amjjbonvin
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
This basically only checks the validity of the defined version - looking good.
No automated tagging yet, correct?
7 tasks
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
3 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
You are about to submit a new Pull Request. Before continuing make sure you read the contributing guidelines.
Checklist
DOES NOT APPLY
Summary of the Pull Request
In this project the developers opted to do a manual increase in each pull-request - see 421806c. However no check was adedd to verify if the manually proposed version is valid. This PR adds a new action that will check if the version proposed in the PR is adequate; it checks:
Related Issue
Additional Info