-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
keyring in raft #23977
Merged
Merged
keyring in raft #23977
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
13 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
1c1704d
keyring in raft
tgross 5c85785
address more comments on code review
tgross ae8d5f9
fix restore code path
tgross e75596c
improve logs
tgross eb8025c
handle errors correctly in backoff and AddWrappedKey
tgross b02a480
refactor: rename structs
tgross 665a7df
tidying up docstrings and order of function definitions for readability
tgross a1b8ce1
add test for plan apply without ready keyring
tgross 6be644d
allow restore to work without encrypter for CLI
tgross adb696c
rename wasMigrated to stateChanged for clarity
tgross 1e781c2
bump min version to 1.9.0-dev
tgross 67579ae
missed waiting for keyring in plan apply test
tgross d603d96
more tests not waiting for keyring
tgross File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ | ||
```release-note:improvement | ||
keyring: Stored wrapped data encryption keys in Raft | ||
``` |
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Some generated files are not rendered by default. Learn more about how customized files appear on GitHub.
Oops, something went wrong.
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Note for reviewers: this logic was lifted from the
csi_hook
, which is reasonably battle-tested at this point. Once we merge this I'll go back and update thecsi_hook
to use this function.