init: skip dependencies declared in development override #37884
+129
−6
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
dbanck
reviewed
Nov 7, 2025
Member
dbanck
left a comment
dbanck
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Thanks for looking into that!
I've tried a handful of scenarios with and without dev_overrides and didn't run into any issues.
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Scratching my own itch here, I found this quite annoying when developing a provider recently. Each time I added another provider to my demo I had to remove my code for the overwritten provider, run init, re-add my code. Quite tedious. With this change init runs successfully with a development override and only installs what is not in the development override.
Fixes #27459
Target Release
1.15.x
Rollback Plan
Changes to Security Controls
Are there any changes to security controls (access controls, encryption, logging) in this pull request? If so, explain.
CHANGELOG entry