Skip to content

Conversation

@hashim21223445
Copy link
Owner

snyk-top-banner

Snyk has created this PR to fix 2 vulnerabilities in the yarn dependencies of this project.

Snyk changed the following file(s):

  • rnd/autogpt_builder/package.json
  • rnd/autogpt_builder/yarn.lock

Note for zero-installs users

If you are using the Yarn feature zero-installs that was introduced in Yarn V2, note that this PR does not update the .yarn/cache/ directory meaning this code cannot be pulled and immediately developed on as one would expect for a zero-install project - you will need to run yarn to update the contents of the ./yarn/cache directory.
If you are not using zero-install you can ignore this as your flow should likely be unchanged.

Vulnerabilities that will be fixed with an upgrade:

Issue Score
high severity Deserialization of Untrusted Data
SNYK-JS-NEXT-14400636
  852  
medium severity Improper Input Validation
SNYK-JS-NANOID-8492085
  529  

Important

  • Check the changes in this PR to ensure they won't cause issues with your project.
  • Max score is 1000. Note that the real score may have changed since the PR was raised.
  • This PR was automatically created by Snyk using the credentials of a real user.

Note: You are seeing this because you or someone else with access to this repository has authorized Snyk to open fix PRs.

For more information:
🧐 View latest project report
📜 Customise PR templates
🛠 Adjust project settings
📚 Read about Snyk's upgrade logic


Learn how to fix vulnerabilities with free interactive lessons:

🦉 Improper Input Validation
🦉 Deserialization of Untrusted Data

@semanticdiff-com
Copy link

semanticdiff-com bot commented Dec 19, 2025

Review changes with  SemanticDiff

Changed Files
File Status
  rnd/autogpt_builder/package.json  0% smaller
  rnd/autogpt_builder/yarn.lock Unsupported file format

@snyk-io
Copy link

snyk-io bot commented Dec 19, 2025

Snyk checks have passed. No issues have been found so far.

Status Scanner Critical High Medium Low Total (0)
Open Source Security 0 0 0 0 0 issues

💻 Catch issues earlier using the plugins for VS Code, JetBrains IDEs, Visual Studio, and Eclipse.

@gemini-code-assist
Copy link

Summary of Changes

Hello @hashim21223445, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request is an automated security upgrade initiated by Snyk to enhance the project's security posture. It updates the 'next' framework dependency to a newer version, specifically targeting and resolving critical and medium-severity vulnerabilities related to untrusted data deserialization and improper input validation. The change ensures the application benefits from the latest security patches without introducing breaking changes.

Highlights

  • Security Vulnerability Fixes: This pull request addresses two identified security vulnerabilities: 'Deserialization of Untrusted Data' (high severity, score 852) and 'Improper Input Validation' (medium severity, score 529).
  • Dependency Upgrade: The primary change involves upgrading the 'next' dependency from version 14.2.32 to 14.2.35 to mitigate the identified vulnerabilities.
  • Yarn Lock File Update: The 'yarn.lock' file has been updated to reflect the new 'next' version and its associated transitive dependencies, including various '@next/swc-*' packages.

🧠 New Feature in Public Preview: You can now enable Memory to help Gemini Code Assist learn from your team's feedback. This makes future code reviews more consistent and personalized to your project's style. Click here to enable Memory in your admin console.

Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands on the current page.

Feature Command Description
Code Review /gemini review Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary /gemini summary Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment @gemini-code-assist Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in pull request comments and review comments.
Help /gemini help Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

  1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution.

Copy link

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

This pull request, automatically generated by Snyk, upgrades the next package from version 14.2.32 to 14.2.35. This update addresses two security vulnerabilities: a high-severity 'Deserialization of Untrusted Data' and a medium-severity 'Improper Input Validation'. The changes are confined to package.json and the corresponding yarn.lock file. The modifications appear correct and necessary for resolving the identified security issues. I find no problems with this upgrade.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants