Implement MARC 264$#3$ (Manufacture)

[blackwinter]

HT016692738 should include the "Manufacture place and date" (MARC 264$#3$); possibly modelled after 264$#1$ (publication).

<datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="3">
  <subfield code="a">Marsberg</subfield>
  <subfield code="b">Boxberger</subfield>
  <subfield code="c">2010</subfield>
</datafield>

Also: Would it make sense to use 008/07-10 (Date 1) as fallback for publication.startDate?

Originally reported as DigiBib-Ticket#2023062250336954.

[TobiasNx]

It seems that there are no fitting properties for manufacture/production that correspondent to publication

Perhaps:
http://www.rdaregistry.info/Elements/m/#P30053

But seems to be a note element.

[TobiasNx]

HT016692738 should include the "Manufacture place and date" (MARC 264$#3$); possibly modelled after 264$#1$ (publication).

<datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="3">
  <subfield code="a">Marsberg</subfield>
  <subfield code="b">Boxberger</subfield>
  <subfield code="c">2010</subfield>
</datafield>

Also: Would it make sense to use 008/07-10 (Date 1) as fallback for publication.startDate?

Originally reported as DigiBib-Ticket#2023062250336954.

btw.:

in the DNB there is also another publisher listed with ind 1: https://portal.dnb.de/opac.htm?method=simpleSearch&cqlMode=true&query=idn%3D1009900439

http://d-nb.info/1009900439/about/marcxml

[acka47]

Re. the data modelling in RDF, there are excisting properties, both in schema.org and RDA unconstrained properties:

schema.org has two bespoke properties that would be used instead of the event-based approach we have for publication (originated in lobid/lodmill#730):

• sdo:productionDate
• sdo:productionCompany

What is missing for our needs is productionLocation. Also, if we used this, we would have it modeled in a completely different way than publication. Thus, this does not fit our use case.

It is similar with RDA:

• rdau:P60072 "has date of manufacture"
• rdau:P60162 "has place of manufacture"
• rdau:P60443 "has manufacturer" resp. rdau:P60546 "has name of manufacturer"
• many more, see http://www.rdaregistry.info/Elements/u/ and search for "manufacture"

However, RDA has the same problem that it would be modeled in a completely different way than publication. Thus the general approach in #1896 makes sense. I will comment on details in the PR.

[TobiasNx]

https://lobid.org/resources/990183958380206441.json

[TobiasNx]

This should be added to the GUI too and also the lobid vocab should be updated.

[dr0i]

The manufacture and manufacturedBy properties are missing in the context(<= labels.json).

[dr0i]

Is this solved @TobiasNx ?

[TobiasNx]

manufacture needs to be presented in the GUI before closing.
Lets do this similar to publication.

But change manufacture and publication to one property segment per array not as many as objects in the array:

[dr0i]

If I recollect properly we agreed at Friday that this issue can be closed and be opened again if anyone needs it actually. @TobiasNx said this issue is solved at nwbib repo and wanted to link to respectively PR so that we can easily copy the code if need arises.

[TobiasNx]

This was the issue in nwbib: hbz/nwbib#627 and this the PR: hbz/nwbib#640

So then we decide to close this.
Until somebody asks for manufacturer in the GUI.