Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

1806 manufacture #1896

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Sep 22, 2023
Merged

1806 manufacture #1896

merged 4 commits into from
Sep 22, 2023

Conversation

TobiasNx
Copy link
Contributor

@TobiasNx TobiasNx commented Sep 18, 2023

Resolves #1806

Add manufacture analog to publication.

Needs to be done/answered, @acka47 can you help:

  • Decide if we just add manufacture as lobid vocab or find a fitting property @acka47
  • Add property and context for manufacture
  • Decide about the type. If sdo:Event is good enough, since it is no PublishingEvent and Event is the "parent"(?) class.

@blackwinter is this what you had in mind?

Copy link
Member

@blackwinter blackwinter left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yes.

Copy link
Contributor

@acka47 acka47 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

As commented

"manufacture" : [ {
"startDate" : "1994",
"type" : [ "Event" ],
"location" : [ "EMI Records Ltd, p 1969" ]
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This seems wrong. It should rather read "manufacturer" or similar and we should put the actual place of manufacture in this field.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This is written in:
$a - Place of production, publication, distribution, manufacture (R)

this seems to be a cataloguing error.

"startDate" : "2010",
"type" : [ "Event" ],
"location" : [ "Marsberg" ],
"manufacturedBy" : [ "Boxberger" ]
Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@acka47 This is a better example.

@TobiasNx TobiasNx marked this pull request as ready for review September 21, 2023 15:39
@TobiasNx
Copy link
Contributor Author

@dr0i you can merge this

@TobiasNx
Copy link
Contributor Author

ahh, but first I have to update the test

@TobiasNx TobiasNx assigned dr0i and unassigned acka47 Sep 22, 2023
@dr0i dr0i merged commit b1676a3 into master Sep 22, 2023
1 check passed
@dr0i
Copy link
Member

dr0i commented Sep 22, 2023

Will be deployed next Monday.

@dr0i dr0i deleted the 1806-manufacture branch September 22, 2023 16:19
@dr0i
Copy link
Member

dr0i commented Sep 25, 2023

The manufacture and manufacturedBy properties are missing in the context(<= labels.json).

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Implement MARC 264$#3$ (Manufacture)
4 participants