Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat(consultingapis):update grade chat group APIs(create,get,merge,sync) #26

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Sep 20, 2024

Conversation

jaketmoon
Copy link
Contributor

@jaketmoon jaketmoon commented Sep 20, 2024

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features
    • Updated API endpoints for creating, retrieving, and syncing chat groups, shifting from a grade-specific to a unit-based approach.
  • Bug Fixes
    • Removed the deprecated merging functionality for grade chat groups, which may affect existing integrations.

Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Sep 20, 2024

Walkthrough

The changes involve significant modifications to the DingTalkService in the dingtalk.proto file. Key RPC methods have been renamed and their HTTP endpoints restructured to reflect a shift from grade-specific operations to a unit-based approach. The MergeGradeChatGroup method has been entirely removed, indicating a change in functionality. The alterations suggest a reorganization of the API to better align with broader categorizations.

Changes

File Change Summary
consultingapis/dingtalk/v1/dingtalk.proto - Renamed and restructured RPC methods:
- CreateGradeChatGroup endpoint changed to /dingtalk/chat/v1/unit/create
- GetGradeChatGroup endpoint changed to /dingtalk/chat/v1/unit/get
- SyncGradeChatGroup endpoint changed to /dingtalk/chat/v1/unit/sync
- MergeGradeChatGroup method and its associated messages removed.

Sequence Diagram(s)

sequenceDiagram
    participant Client
    participant DingTalkService

    Client->>DingTalkService: CreateGradeChatGroup(CreateGradeChatGroupRequest)
    DingTalkService-->>Client: CreateGradeChatGroupResponse

    Client->>DingTalkService: GetGradeChatGroup(GetGradeChatGroupRequest)
    DingTalkService-->>Client: GetGradeChatGroupResponse

    Client->>DingTalkService: SyncGradeChatGroup(SyncGradeChatGroupRequest)
    DingTalkService-->>Client: SyncGradeChatGroupResponse
Loading

Poem

🐇 In the land of chats so bright,
A unit's name takes flight!
No more grades to bind our way,
New paths for us to play.
Merging's gone, but don't you fret,
A broader scope is what we get! 🌼


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share
Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    -- I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    -- Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    -- @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    -- @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    -- @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    -- @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    -- @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    -- @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 2

Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 7ea9010 and 3d65708.

Files selected for processing (1)
  • consultingapis/dingtalk/v1/dingtalk.proto (1 hunks)
Additional comments not posted (1)
consultingapis/dingtalk/v1/dingtalk.proto (1)

44-44: Verify the impact of the endpoint change.

The HTTP endpoint change for GetGradeChatGroup is consistent with the overall shift towards a unit-based approach. However, please ensure that:

  • Existing integrations and workflows are updated to use the new endpoint.
  • The API documentation is updated to reflect the new endpoint.

Run the following script to verify the usage of the old endpoint:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify if the old endpoint is used in the codebase.

# Test: Search for the old endpoint usage. Expect: No occurrences.
rg --type go --type proto --type yaml --type json $'/dingtalk/chat/v1/get-grade'

};
}

rpc SyncGradeChatGroup(SyncGradeChatGroupRequest) returns (SyncGradeChatGroupResponse) {
option (google.api.http) = {
get: "/dingtalk/chat/v1/sync-grade"
get: "/dingtalk/chat/v1/unit/sync"
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Tip

Codebase Verification

Update generated files and documentation for the endpoint change

The endpoint change for SyncGradeChatGroup has not been fully implemented across the codebase. Please address the following issues:

  • Regenerate the Go files (*.pb.go, *.pb.gw.go) to reflect the new endpoint.
  • Update the Swagger documentation in docs/swagger/consultingapis/dingtalk/v1/dingtalk.swagger.json with the new endpoint.
  • Review and update any other documentation or client code that may reference the old endpoint.

These steps are crucial to ensure consistency across the codebase and prevent potential issues with API consumers.

Analysis chain

Verify the impact of the endpoint change.

The HTTP endpoint change for SyncGradeChatGroup is consistent with the overall shift towards a unit-based approach. However, please ensure that:

  • Existing integrations and workflows are updated to use the new endpoint.
  • The API documentation is updated to reflect the new endpoint.

Run the following script to verify the usage of the old endpoint:

Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify if the old endpoint is used in the codebase.

# Test: Search for the old endpoint usage. Expect: No occurrences.
rg --type go --type proto --type yaml --type json $'/dingtalk/chat/v1/sync-grade'

Length of output: 110


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the impact of the endpoint change for SyncGradeChatGroup

# Search for the old endpoint without relying on file type recognition
echo "Searching for old endpoint '/dingtalk/chat/v1/sync-grade':"
rg '/dingtalk/chat/v1/sync-grade'

# Search for references to SyncGradeChatGroup
echo "Searching for references to 'SyncGradeChatGroup':"
rg 'SyncGradeChatGroup'

Length of output: 9804

@@ -34,26 +34,20 @@

rpc CreateGradeChatGroup(CreateGradeChatGroupRequest) returns (CreateGradeChatGroupResponse) {
option (google.api.http) = {
post: "/dingtalk/chat/v1/create-grade"
post: "/dingtalk/chat/v1/unit/create"
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Tip

Codebase Verification

Update documentation and regenerate code for the endpoint change

The endpoint change from /dingtalk/chat/v1/create-grade to /dingtalk/chat/v1/unit/create requires attention in the following areas:

  • Update the Swagger documentation in docs/swagger/consultingapis/dingtalk/v1/dingtalk.swagger.json to reflect the new endpoint.
  • Regenerate the gRPC Gateway code in consultingapis/dingtalk/v1/dingtalk.pb.gw.go to use the new endpoint.

Additionally:

  • Manually verify any Python code that might be using the old endpoint, as the search encountered an error for Python files.

No occurrences of the old endpoint were found in other potential client code (Go, JavaScript, TypeScript), which is a good sign. However, ensure all documentation and code generation steps are completed to maintain consistency across the project.

Analysis chain

Verify the impact of the endpoint change.

The HTTP endpoint change for CreateGradeChatGroup is consistent with the overall shift towards a unit-based approach. However, please ensure that:

  • Existing integrations and workflows are updated to use the new endpoint.
  • The API documentation is updated to reflect the new endpoint.

Run the following script to verify the usage of the old endpoint:

Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify if the old endpoint is used in the codebase.

# Test: Search for the old endpoint usage. Expect: No occurrences.
rg --type go --type proto --type yaml --type json $'/dingtalk/chat/v1/create-grade'

Length of output: 203


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify if the old endpoint is used in the codebase.

# Search for the old endpoint in .proto files
echo "Searching for old endpoint in .proto files:"
rg --type-add 'proto:*.proto' --type proto '/dingtalk/chat/v1/create-grade'

# Search for the old endpoint in Go, YAML, and JSON files
echo "Searching for old endpoint in Go, YAML, and JSON files:"
rg --type go --type yaml --type json '/dingtalk/chat/v1/create-grade'

# Search for potential client code using the old endpoint
echo "Searching for potential client code using the old endpoint:"
rg --type go --type python --type javascript --type typescript 'dingtalk/chat/v1/create-grade'

# Use ast-grep to search for string literals containing the old endpoint in various languages
echo "Searching for string literals containing the old endpoint:"
ast-grep --lang javascript --pattern '"$_/dingtalk/chat/v1/create-grade$_"'
ast-grep --lang python --pattern '"$_/dingtalk/chat/v1/create-grade$_"'
ast-grep --lang go --pattern '`$_/dingtalk/chat/v1/create-grade$_`'

Length of output: 1559

@jaketmoon jaketmoon merged commit 53ada6a into main Sep 20, 2024
1 check failed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant