Skip to content

[Snyk] Security upgrade urllib3 from 1.25.11 to 2.6.3#15

Open
hevnsnt wants to merge 1 commit intomasterfrom
snyk-fix-6e18aa281f33f243b460d0c8833af001
Open

[Snyk] Security upgrade urllib3 from 1.25.11 to 2.6.3#15
hevnsnt wants to merge 1 commit intomasterfrom
snyk-fix-6e18aa281f33f243b460d0c8833af001

Conversation

@hevnsnt
Copy link
Owner

@hevnsnt hevnsnt commented Jan 20, 2026

snyk-top-banner

Snyk has created this PR to fix 1 vulnerabilities in the pip dependencies of this project.

Snyk changed the following file(s):

  • requirements.txt
⚠️ Warning
equests 2.23.0 requires urllib3, which is not installed.

Important

  • Check the changes in this PR to ensure they won't cause issues with your project.
  • Max score is 1000. Note that the real score may have changed since the PR was raised.
  • This PR was automatically created by Snyk using the credentials of a real user.
  • Some vulnerabilities couldn't be fully fixed and so Snyk will still find them when the project is tested again. This may be because the vulnerability existed within more than one direct dependency, but not all of the affected dependencies could be upgraded.

Note: You are seeing this because you or someone else with access to this repository has authorized Snyk to open fix PRs.

For more information:
🧐 View latest project report
📜 Customise PR templates
🛠 Adjust project settings
📚 Read about Snyk's upgrade logic


Learn how to fix vulnerabilities with free interactive lessons:

🦉 Learn about vulnerability in an interactive lesson of Snyk Learn.

The following vulnerabilities are fixed by pinning transitive dependencies:
- https://snyk.io/vuln/SNYK-PYTHON-URLLIB3-14896210
@gemini-code-assist
Copy link

Summary of Changes

Hello @hevnsnt, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request, automatically generated by Snyk, addresses a critical security vulnerability by upgrading the urllib3 dependency to a more secure version. The primary goal is to enhance the project's security posture by mitigating risks associated with the older, vulnerable version of urllib3.

Highlights

  • Dependency Upgrade: The urllib3 dependency has been upgraded from version 1.25.11 to 2.6.3 to address a security vulnerability. This change was automatically generated by Snyk.
  • Security Fix: This pull request aims to fix one identified vulnerability related to urllib3 by ensuring a secure version is used.

🧠 New Feature in Public Preview: You can now enable Memory to help Gemini Code Assist learn from your team's feedback. This makes future code reviews more consistent and personalized to your project's style. Click here to enable Memory in your admin console.

Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands on the current page.

Feature Command Description
Code Review /gemini review Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary /gemini summary Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment @gemini-code-assist Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in pull request comments and review comments.
Help /gemini help Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

  1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution.

Copy link

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

This pull request from Snyk aims to fix a security vulnerability by upgrading urllib3. However, the proposed upgrade to urllib3>=2.6.3 is incompatible with the currently pinned requests==2.23.0, which requires urllib3<1.26. This will cause a dependency conflict and likely break your application. To resolve this, you must also upgrade the requests package to a version that supports urllib3 2.x, such as requests>=2.31.0.

requests==2.23.0
stem==1.8.0
colorama==0.4.3
urllib3>=2.6.3 # not directly required, pinned by Snyk to avoid a vulnerability

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

critical

This upgrade of urllib3 to a 2.x version introduces a breaking incompatibility with requests==2.23.0 (defined on line 2), which requires urllib3<1.26. This dependency conflict will likely cause your application to fail when making HTTP requests.

To fix this, you need to upgrade requests to a compatible version. I recommend upgrading requests to at least version 2.31.0, which is compatible with urllib3 v2.x. You should update your requirements.txt to reflect this, for example:

requests>=2.31.0
urllib3>=2.6.3

You would need to update line 2 (requests==2.23.0) and this new line accordingly.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants