Enable Ruff d200 rule

[MarcSkovMadsen]

Continues from #982. So review that one first.

I've re-renabled rule D200 in pyproject.toml and applied ruff check --unsafe-fixes.

Then checked the changes manually.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 87.33%. Comparing base (0d73ff5) to head (c14fba2).
Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main     #983   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   87.33%   87.33%           
=======================================
  Files           9        9           
  Lines        4928     4928           
=======================================
  Hits         4304     4304           
  Misses        624      624           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[maximlt]

@MarcSkovMadsen in case it wasn't clear, I did not suggest to open one PR per rule:

I'm not necessarily saying one rule at a time. It's just I'd like to avoid having to review all the docstrings of the complete API at once, as it's a lot, and I'm quite sure there are a few traps along the way that could slow you down or even block you entirely if done in one PR, while if you iterate we can be much more efficient and release improvements quickly.

I think it's totally fine if you open one PR that enables multiple rules at the same time, specially if it's only about formatting. Things will get more challenging for reviewers as soon as you'll touch the real meat which is the content of the docstrings.

cc @hoxbro

[MarcSkovMadsen]

Are you expecting me to squash and merge?

[hoxbro]

It was a bit hard to rebase so maybe take a look that everything is ok and then merge it.