Provide a way for policy engines to pass additional state to callbacks #92
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Signed-off-by: Peter Broadhurst <peter.broadhurst@kaleido.io>
Codecov Report
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #92 +/- ##
=======================================
Coverage 99.98% 99.98%
=======================================
Files 77 77
Lines 5004 5008 +4
=======================================
+ Hits 5003 5007 +4
Misses 1 1
|
Chengxuan
approved these changes
Jul 3, 2023
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Provides an alternative approach the 2nd item in #91 , allowing any policy engine implementation to pass a closure in with additional variables it's safe for that implementation to pass through. For example, a transaction-specific context object.