Add verbose in get_dep_no_obs()

[Rafnuss]

When using get_*() and map_dep() with a species filter, it is expected that some of my deployements won't have any observations of this species. I find the list of deployements display unecessary and suggest to have a verbose argument to the function.

> get_rai(pkg, species = "Suni")
There are 103 deployments without observations: 2022-05-13_L5_c10, 2020-11-10_K3_c05, 2021-06-26_I6_c09, 2020-08-29_G8_c09, 2021-04-25_F4_c01, 2020-08-29_H9_c03, 2020-01-14_I7_C10, 2022-02-27_K5_c09, 2021-09-03_C2_c10, 2022-05-13_M5_c09, 2019-11-07_k7_C01, 2019-08-23_j8_c03, 2020-01-13_h8_c07, 2021-06-26_K7_c05, 2019-04-17_i9_C09, 2022-02-26_D5_c01, 2020-01-14_J7_C09, 2020-05-27_G4_c10, 2019-09-21_h7_C07, 2020-05-28_H4_c09 and others..

[damianooldoni]

Hi @Rafnuss: thanks for this contribution. Really appreciated!
My thoughts:

1. We shouldn't implement this in main, see my comment Remove read_wi() from camtraptor #351 (comment). I try to avoid adding new functionalities in main as I would like to finalize camtraptor version 1.0 asap. Doing this in main will result in a lot of conflicts when trying to pull changes in dev branch version-1.0.
2. Implement verbosity at package level, see discussion in related issue Add verbose in get_dep_no_obs() #356
3. I prefer to do this later on: something for camtraptor 1.1.

[damianooldoni]

@Rafnuss: is it ok if I add label "on hold" for this PR? I don't want to close it as it is a very good reminder for all of us.

[Rafnuss]

@Rafnuss: is it ok if I add label "on hold" for this PR? I don't want to close it as it is a very good reminder for all of us.

Yes, make sense to update the entire package with this package level verbosity. I like the idea!