Skip to content

Conversation

@dsding2
Copy link

@dsding2 dsding2 commented Jun 4, 2025

No description provided.

@inducer
Copy link
Owner

inducer commented Jun 4, 2025

Thanks! Could you look at the test failures? The typo and the type errors will get addressed via #937 before this lands, so feel free to ignore those for now, unless they seem related to your code.

Edit: you can also ignore the doctest mismatches (in tutorial.rst).

@inducer
Copy link
Owner

inducer commented Jun 13, 2025

#937 has landed, and CI on the main branch now passes cleanly. It might be worth updating this to see how things go.

Copy link
Owner

@inducer inducer left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks! Here's some feedback from a first look.

@inducer inducer force-pushed the opencl_allocation branch from 3a86afd to b24fe99 Compare August 28, 2025 23:29
return frozenset(result)


def _get_temporaries_accessed_in_schedule(
Copy link
Owner

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Can this handle RunInstruction outermost?



@memoize_on_first_arg
def get_sched_index_to_first_and_last_used(
Copy link
Owner

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Rather than "implicitly" attaching allocations to schedule items, maybe realize them explicitly as a new kind of schedule item?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants