Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Update simd versions running in CI #4205

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Oct 3, 2024
Merged

Update simd versions running in CI #4205

merged 3 commits into from
Oct 3, 2024

Conversation

ljoss17
Copy link
Contributor

@ljoss17 ljoss17 commented Sep 30, 2024 •
edited
Loading

Closes: #4202

Description

Update the following versions of simd running tests in CI:

  • From v6.3.0 to v6.3.1
  • From v7.4.0 to v7.8.0
  • From v8.3.1 to v8.5.1
  • From v9.0.0-beta.1 to v9.0.0-rc.0

PR author checklist:

  • Added changelog entry, using unclog.
  • Added tests: integration (for Hermes) or unit/mock tests (for modules).
  • Linked to GitHub issue.
  • Updated code comments and documentation (e.g., docs/).
  • Tagged one reviewer who will be the one responsible for shepherding this PR.

Reviewer checklist:

  • Reviewed Files changed in the GitHub PR explorer.
  • Manually tested (in case integration/unit/mock tests are absent).

@ljoss17 ljoss17 requested a review from romac October 1, 2024 12:15
@ljoss17 ljoss17 marked this pull request as ready for review October 1, 2024 12:16
@ljoss17 ljoss17 added this pull request to the merge queue Oct 3, 2024
Merged via the queue into master with commit deb1a8b Oct 3, 2024
20 checks passed
@ljoss17 ljoss17 deleted the luca_joss/update-simd-versions branch October 3, 2024 15:47
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@romac romac romac approved these changes

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Update simd versions used in CI
2 participants
@ljoss17 @romac