-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 9
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
430 use expect_no_error
in tests instead of expect_error(, NA)
#240
Conversation
Code Coverage Summary
Diff against main
Results for commit: b032f59 Minimum allowed coverage is ♻️ This comment has been updated with latest results |
…nsightsengineering/teal.reporter into 430_expect_no_error_tests@main
Unit Tests Summary 1 files 18 suites 11s ⏱️ Results for commit b032f59. ♻️ This comment has been updated with latest results. |
Signed-off-by: Marcin <133694481+m7pr@users.noreply.github.com>
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM. Added a few prefixes
I've updated WORDLIST and deferred solving the underlying issues in the pre-release (#237 (comment))
you are the man! thanks |
Part of https://github.com/insightsengineering/coredev-tasks/issues/430