extend: align with Linux upstream extend interface#473
Open
fengyuleidian0615 wants to merge 1 commit intointel:mainfrom
Open
extend: align with Linux upstream extend interface#473fengyuleidian0615 wants to merge 1 commit intointel:mainfrom
fengyuleidian0615 wants to merge 1 commit intointel:mainfrom
Conversation
With merge of unified extend interface[1] in Linux 6.16, now switch to standard interface, and abandon previous ioctl. [1]: Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-devices-virtual-misc-tdx_guest The inconsistent interface issue was orignally reported here: intel#472 Signed-off-by: Fan Du <fan.du@intel.com>
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
With merge of unified extend interface in Linux 6.16, now switch to standard interface, and abandon previous ioctl.
Linux/Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-devices-virtual-misc-tdx_guest
The inconsistent interface issue was orignally reported here: #472