Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[SYCL] Correct handling of enumeration specialization constants #12925

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Mar 8, 2024

Conversation

victor-eds
Copy link
Contributor

Lower enumeration specialization constants to SpecConstant in SPIR-V instead of SpecConstantComposite, thus handling them using their underlying integral types.

Lower enumeration specialization constants to `SpecConstant` in SPIR-V
instead of `SpecConstantComposite`, thus handling them using their
underlying integral types.

Signed-off-by: Victor Perez <victor.perez@codeplay.com>
@victor-eds victor-eds self-assigned this Mar 6, 2024
@victor-eds victor-eds requested a review from a team as a code owner March 6, 2024 15:31
@victor-eds victor-eds requested a review from maarquitos14 March 6, 2024 15:31
@victor-eds
Copy link
Contributor Author

victor-eds commented Mar 6, 2024

This handles #12703

@victor-eds
Copy link
Contributor Author

@AlexeySachkov following on our conversation in #12703. Can you take a look at my proposed solution?

@maarquitos14
Copy link
Contributor

@victor-eds the pre-commit failure is known and has been reported already in #12791. I don't think it's related to your changes.

Copy link
Contributor

@maarquitos14 maarquitos14 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM.

@sommerlukas
Copy link
Contributor

Windows CI failure unrelated.

@sommerlukas sommerlukas merged commit 1f0dc36 into intel:sycl Mar 8, 2024
11 of 12 checks passed
@victor-eds victor-eds deleted the enum-spec-const branch March 8, 2024 10:00
@sommerlukas
Copy link
Contributor

Unrelated failure in post-commit reported here: #12956

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants