Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[sharding_in_types] If out_aval.sharding is not None and the user specified out_sharding is None, concretize it with the device assignment available and add it to the final out_shardings that's used for lowering and compilation. #24387

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 18, 2024

Conversation

copybara-service[bot]
Copy link

[sharding_in_types] If out_aval.sharding is not None and the user specified out_sharding is None, concretize it with the device assignment available and add it to the final out_shardings that's used for lowering and compilation.

This will allow us to return the exact sharding spec that sharding propagation rules figured out.

…cified out_sharding is None, concretize it with the device assignment available and add it to the final out_shardings that's used for lowering and compilation.

This will allow us to return the exact sharding spec that sharding propagation rules figured out.

PiperOrigin-RevId: 687349015
@copybara-service copybara-service bot merged commit 2153de4 into main Oct 18, 2024
@copybara-service copybara-service bot deleted the test_687174276 branch October 18, 2024 17:28
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant