Skip to content

Conversation

ZXShady
Copy link
Contributor

@ZXShady ZXShady commented Jul 30, 2025

Fixes #151 and #152

Also fixes the issue of ASSERT(1 = 5) compiling

@ZXShady ZXShady force-pushed the more_comparisons branch 7 times, most recently from 0f3377e to 170df2b Compare July 30, 2025 10:08
@ZXShady
Copy link
Contributor Author

ZXShady commented Jul 30, 2025

hmm it seems I have changed runtime behavior. although I would say that you shouldn't be putting side effects in your asserts but it still changed behavior

I think I will leave the bitfields out but keep the null thingy

@ZXShady ZXShady force-pushed the more_comparisons branch 10 times, most recently from b46c7c3 to ccc0374 Compare July 31, 2025 01:10
@ZXShady ZXShady force-pushed the more_comparisons branch from ccc0374 to b9a5273 Compare July 31, 2025 01:12
@ZXShady ZXShady force-pushed the more_comparisons branch 2 times, most recently from 22c2599 to aa89ed3 Compare August 2, 2025 02:10
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

error: comparison between pointer and integer
1 participant