Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update to JupyterLab v4.4.0a2 #7559

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Jan 7, 2025
Merged

Update to JupyterLab v4.4.0a2 #7559

merged 2 commits into from
Jan 7, 2025

Conversation

jtpio
Copy link
Member

@jtpio jtpio commented Jan 6, 2025

New JupyterLab release v4.4.0a2 is available. Please review the lock file carefully.

Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Jan 6, 2025

Binder 👈 Launch a Binder on branch jtpio/notebook/update-to-v4.4.0a2

@jtpio jtpio added this to the 7.4.0 milestone Jan 6, 2025
@jtpio
Copy link
Member Author

jtpio commented Jan 6, 2025

Ah looks like jupyterlab/jupyterlab#17092 may be causing the following build issue:

image

Error: ../../node_modules/@jupyterlab/docregistry/lib/default.d.ts(267,9): error TS2380: The return type of a 'get' accessor must be assignable to its 'set' accessor type
  Type 'undefined' is not assignable to type 'string'.

@jtpio jtpio force-pushed the update-to-v4.4.0a2 branch from 2a9d9d6 to 5d3c8e4 Compare January 7, 2025 09:42
@@ -272,7 +272,8 @@
"@jupyterlab/filebrowser-extension:default-file-browser"
],
"@jupyterlab/fileeditor-extension": [
"@jupyterlab/fileeditor-extension:plugin"
"@jupyterlab/fileeditor-extension:plugin",
"@jupyterlab/fileeditor-extension:widget-factory"
Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@jtpio
Copy link
Member Author

jtpio commented Jan 7, 2025

Merging to get this in a pre-release.

@jtpio jtpio merged commit 18672b7 into jupyter:main Jan 7, 2025
31 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant