Skip to content

work behind proxy #170

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Dec 12, 2023
Merged

work behind proxy #170

merged 1 commit into from
Dec 12, 2023

Conversation

kevincobain2000
Copy link
Owner

No description provided.

@kevincobain2000 kevincobain2000 merged commit e3aeb88 into master Dec 12, 2023
@kevincobain2000 kevincobain2000 deleted the feature/proxy branch December 12, 2023 02:29
@kevincobain2000
Copy link
Owner Author

kevincobain2000 commented Dec 12, 2023

Hi @juev

Sorry had to merge and push so quickly as our entire corporate CI started failing, as the new tls settings. The new doRequest() didn't pick up the http proxy set on the environment.

So I have rolled back to the previously working code block for the doRequest()

@juev
Copy link
Collaborator

juev commented Dec 12, 2023

Ok, thank you very much!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants