Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[7.67.x-blue] RHPAM-4779: SLA due date value in ProcessInstanceLog table is not updated after updating process SLA #3050

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Jul 16, 2024

Conversation

akumar074
Copy link
Member

(cherry picked from commit b19df69 4279f84)

Thank you for submitting this pull request

JIRA: RHPAM-4779

referenced Pull Requests:

How to replicate CI configuration locally?

Build Chain tool does "simple" maven build(s), the builds are just Maven commands, but because the repositories relates and depends on each other and any change in API or class method could affect several of those repositories there is a need to use build-chain tool to handle cross repository builds and be sure that we always use latest version of the code for each repository.

build-chain tool is a build tool which can be used on command line locally or in Github Actions workflow(s), in case you need to change multiple repositories and send multiple dependent pull requests related with a change you can easily reproduce the same build by executing it on Github hosted environment or locally in your development environment. See local execution details to get more information about it.

How to retest this PR or trigger a specific build:
  • a pull request please add comment: Jenkins retest this

  • a full downstream build please add comment: Jenkins run fdb

  • a compile downstream build please add comment: Jenkins run cdb

  • a full production downstream build please add comment: Jenkins execute product fdb

  • an upstream build please add comment: Jenkins run upstream

How to backport a pull request to a different branch?

In order to automatically create a backporting pull request please add one or more labels having the following format backport-<branch-name>, where <branch-name> is the name of the branch where the pull request must be backported to (e.g., backport-7.67.x to backport the original PR to the 7.67.x branch).

NOTE: backporting is an action aiming to move a change (usually a commit) from a branch (usually the main one) to another one, which is generally referring to a still maintained release branch. Keeping it simple: it is about to move a specific change or a set of them from one branch to another.

Once the original pull request is successfully merged, the automated action will create one backporting pull request per each label (with the previous format) that has been added.

If something goes wrong, the author will be notified and at this point a manual backporting is needed.

NOTE: this automated backporting is triggered whenever a pull request on main branch is labeled or closed, but both conditions must be satisfied to get the new PR created.

…ated after updating process SLA

(cherry picked from commit b19df69)
(cherry picked from commit 4279f84)
@akumar074 akumar074 changed the title RHPAM-4779: SLA due date value in ProcessInstanceLog table is not updated after updating process SLA [7.67.x-blue] RHPAM-4779: SLA due date value in ProcessInstanceLog table is not updated after updating process SLA Jul 9, 2024
@akumar074 akumar074 requested a review from baldimir July 10, 2024 04:12
@akumar074
Copy link
Member Author

Jenkins retest this

3 similar comments
@akumar074
Copy link
Member Author

Jenkins retest this

@akumar074
Copy link
Member Author

Jenkins retest this

@akumar074
Copy link
Member Author

Jenkins retest this

Copy link

sonarcloud bot commented Jul 16, 2024

@akumar074 akumar074 merged commit 19615c3 into kiegroup:7.67.x-blue Jul 16, 2024
2 of 4 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants