Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Ws backend #42

Merged
merged 7 commits into from
May 12, 2024
Merged

Ws backend #42

merged 7 commits into from
May 12, 2024

Conversation

ksysoev
Copy link
Owner

@ksysoev ksysoev commented May 3, 2024

Adds implementation for WS backend and implements code example with pass-through ws messages to backend ws server.

@codecov-commenter
Copy link

codecov-commenter commented May 12, 2024

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 81.25000% with 12 lines in your changes are missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 88.76%. Comparing base (0f243f5) to head (b444a85).

Files Patch % Lines
backend/ws.go 81.25% 8 Missing and 4 partials ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main      #42      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   89.52%   88.76%   -0.77%     
==========================================
  Files          17       18       +1     
  Lines         630      694      +64     
==========================================
+ Hits          564      616      +52     
- Misses         51       59       +8     
- Partials       15       19       +4     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@ksysoev ksysoev marked this pull request as ready for review May 12, 2024 06:47
@ksysoev ksysoev merged commit 0477a1e into main May 12, 2024
1 check passed
@ksysoev ksysoev mentioned this pull request May 12, 2024
@ksysoev ksysoev deleted the ws_backend branch May 12, 2024 10:23
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants