-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 296
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
🌱 Remove reconcile when APIserver is online in VSphereCluster controller #2551
🌱 Remove reconcile when APIserver is online in VSphereCluster controller #2551
Conversation
Signed-off-by: Stefan Büringer buringerst@vmware.com
/assign @chrischdi @fabriziopandini /cc @rikatz |
@@ -223,25 +220,6 @@ func (r *clusterReconciler) reconcileNormal(ctx context.Context, clusterCtx *cap | |||
|
|||
clusterCtx.VSphereCluster.Status.Ready = true | |||
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
There is nothing (anymore) in the Reconcile func that depends on the wl cluster APIserver being online
(this was different in previous versions where this controller deployed CCM/CSI)
/test pull-cluster-api-provider-vsphere-e2e-full-main |
Codecov ReportAttention:
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #2551 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 63.58% 63.10% -0.49%
==========================================
Files 120 120
Lines 8685 8599 -86
==========================================
- Hits 5522 5426 -96
- Misses 2735 2745 +10
Partials 428 428 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
Very nice cleanup. The e2e-full-main tests already run 👍 /lgtm |
LGTM label has been added. Git tree hash: 5cb08208b021f995e7f4b523a0de6f5673c17d23
|
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: chrischdi The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
Signed-off-by: Stefan Büringer buringerst@vmware.com
What this PR does / why we need it:
See #2465 (comment)
Kudos to @chrischdi for the nice research!!
Which issue(s) this PR fixes (optional, in
fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)
format, will close the issue(s) when PR gets merged):Fixes #2465