Increase Reporter extensibility#3291
Conversation
|
|
Welcome @tylerFowler! |
|
Hi @tylerFowler. Thanks for your PR. I'm waiting for a kubernetes member to verify that this patch is reasonable to test. If it is, they should reply with Once the patch is verified, the new status will be reflected by the I understand the commands that are listed here. DetailsInstructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. |
|
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: tylerFowler The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. DetailsNeeds approval from an approver in each of these files:Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
|
Extra context: I'm creating CL2 tests fully programmatically, I'm skipping the |
|
The Kubernetes project currently lacks enough contributors to adequately respond to all PRs. This bot triages PRs according to the following rules:
You can:
Please send feedback to sig-contributor-experience at kubernetes/community. /lifecycle stale |
|
The Kubernetes project currently lacks enough active contributors to adequately respond to all PRs. This bot triages PRs according to the following rules:
You can:
Please send feedback to sig-contributor-experience at kubernetes/community. /lifecycle rotten |
|
The Kubernetes project currently lacks enough active contributors to adequately respond to all issues and PRs. This bot triages PRs according to the following rules:
You can:
Please send feedback to sig-contributor-experience at kubernetes/community. /close |
|
@k8s-triage-robot: Closed this PR. DetailsIn response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. |
What type of PR is this?
/kind feature
What this PR does / why we need it:
This change exposes the SubstepResult struct in order to make
test.Reportera fully extensible interface. Currently the only out-of-the-box Reporter implementation invokes its ownReportTestStepFinishmethod, which does expose this data, but seemingly only to itself (it probably shouldn't be in the main interface for this reason). It relies on a package-private method fromReportTestStepto fill out this data, and the default Executor only invokes that top level method – this prevents users from implementing custom reporters with any level of test-step visibility.The only way to access this newly public substep data is via the
StepResult.GetAllResultsmethod which is already mutex protected so simply exposing this seems safe. To that end only getter methods are added to ensure data mutation is limited.Which issue(s) this PR fixes:
Fixes #
Special notes for your reviewer: