Write all unit tests and refactor for testing.#14
Conversation
Extract shortcut validation logic from createQuickPickWithShortcuts method: - Add validateShortcuts() pure function for duplicate shortcut detection - Remove VS Code API dependency from validation logic - Improve testability by separating business logic from UI concerns
Extract shortcut finding logic from createQuickPickWithShortcuts method into a reusable findShortcutItem pure function to improve testability. - Add findShortcutItem function for shortcut-based item lookup - Refactor createQuickPickWithShortcuts to use extracted function - Update TESTING_GUIDE.md progress tracking
…ortcuts - Extract createQuickPickCommandExecutor function for better testability - Improve separation of concerns in QuickPick command handling - Maintain duplicate execution prevention logic - Enable easier unit testing of command execution flow
- Add determineButtonExecutionType for button type checking logic - Add executeTerminalCommand for command execution logic - Refactor executeButtonCommand to use extracted functions - Improve testability and code readability
- Add createQuickPickItems pure function for better testability - Update showGroupQuickPick to use extracted function - Mark task complete in TESTING_GUIDE.md
- Extract executeCommandsRecursively pure function for testability - Separate recursive logic from button validation logic - Update TESTING_GUIDE.md with completed task status
- Add calculateButtonPriority pure function to status-bar-manager.ts - Refactor createCommandButtons method to use extracted function - Update TESTING_GUIDE.md with completed refactoring task
- Extract createTooltipText pure function from StatusBarManager.createCommandButtons - Improve code testability by separating tooltip generation logic - Update testing guide progress tracking
- Add createButtonCommand pure function to extract command creation logic - Refactor createCommandButtons method to use the new function - Improve testability by separating concerns
…nager.ts - Add configureRefreshButton pure function to separate button configuration logic - Refactor createRefreshButton method to use the extracted function - Improve testability by isolating business logic from VS Code API dependencies
- Add createTreeItemsFromGroup pure function - Refactor getChildren method to use extracted function - Update TESTING_GUIDE.md progress tracking
- Extract root tree item creation logic into pure function for better testability - Simplify getRootItems method to use the extracted function - Update TESTING_GUIDE.md to reflect completed refactoring task
- Extract shouldCreateNewTerminal function for terminal creation logic - Extract determineTerminalName function for terminal naming logic - Remove duplicate generateTerminalName method - Improve code testability without changing behavior
- Extract webview HTML generation into pure functions - Split _getHtmlForWebview into smaller testable units - Extract configuration update logic for better testability - Update TESTING_GUIDE.md progress tracking
- Extract configuration constants (CONFIG_SECTION, DEFAULT_REFRESH_CONFIG) - Extract getButtonsFromConfig pure function - Extract getRefreshConfigFromConfig pure function - Extract isQuickCommandButtonsConfigChange pure function - Improve code structure for unit testing
- Add createQuickPickItemsFromButtons pure function - Improve testability by separating business logic from VS Code API - No functional changes, only code organization improvement
- Extract registerCommands function from activate method - Improve code organization and testability - Complete Phase 1 refactoring for all files
- All files have been successfully refactored to be unit-test friendly - Pure functions extracted for all business logic - VS Code API dependencies isolated through adapter pattern - Ready to proceed to Phase 2 (Test Implementation)
- Test success cases with unique shortcuts - Test failure cases with duplicate shortcuts (case insensitive) - Test edge cases: empty arrays, missing shortcuts, multiple duplicates - Add minimal VS Code mocking for import resolution - All 6 test cases passing ✅
- Add 8 test cases covering case insensitive matching - Test failure cases for non-existent shortcuts and invalid input - Test edge cases including empty arrays and items without shortcuts - All tests passing with full coverage of function logic
- Add 8 test cases covering all execution paths - Test executeAll, showQuickPick, executeCommand, and invalid scenarios - Include edge cases for empty commands and mixed configurations - All tests passing with 100% coverage for this function
- Add 7 test cases covering success, failure, and edge cases - Test shortcut display in labels, empty commands, mixed configurations - Verify object reference preservation and empty array handling - All tests pass successfully
- Add comprehensive test coverage for executeTerminalCommand function - Test success cases with various parameter combinations - Test failure cases when command is undefined or empty - All 35 tests passing
…nction - Add 9 test cases covering success, failure, and edge cases - Test recursive command execution with nested groups - Verify executeAll flag behavior in complex structures - All 44 tests passing
- Implement comprehensive test coverage for calculateButtonPriority - Add 5 test cases covering success, failure, and edge cases - Verify descending priority order for sequential indices - Update TESTING_GUIDE.md progress tracking
- Add comprehensive test coverage for tooltip text generation logic - Test group buttons, command buttons, and fallback scenarios - Verify group takes priority over command in mixed configurations - All 5 test cases passing
- Add 5 test cases covering command buttons, group buttons, and edge cases - Verify proper command object structure and button reference preservation - All tests passing (59/59)
- Add 6 test cases covering success, failure, and edge scenarios - Test property configuration and preservation of existing properties - Ensure robust handling of undefined/null values and edge cases - All tests pass, maintaining 100% test success rate
- Add tests for simple command tree item creation - Add tests for VS Code API and terminal name handling - Add tests for edge cases and error conditions - Update VS Code mock to include TreeItem, TreeItemCollapsibleState, and ThemeIcon - Mark createTreeItemsFromGroup function testing as completed in TESTING_GUIDE.md
- Add tests for shouldCreateNewTerminal function - Add tests for determineTerminalName function - Ensure 100% coverage for extracted pure functions - All tests passing (79/79)
- Add test cases for config retrieval with buttons array - Add test case for empty config fallback behavior - Use existing vscode mock and extend it minimally - Tests cover success and edge cases for single function
- Add HTML structure validation tests - Add configuration UI message content tests - Add viewport meta tag presence tests - All 3 test cases pass successfully
…s function - Add 6 test cases covering success, failure, and edge cases - Test basic replacement, multiple occurrences, empty HTML, and complex structures - Maintain 100% test success rate (90/90 tests passing) - Update TESTING_GUIDE.md progress tracking
- Add 7 test cases covering CSP injection, vscode API script injection - Include success cases, failure cases, and edge cases - Test proper positioning, multiple head tags, and content preservation - All tests passing (97/97)
- Add tests for success/failure cases of file existence checking - Add edge case tests for empty paths, relative paths, and special characters - Mock fs.existsSync using Jest module mocking - All 102 tests now passing
…function - Add 6 new test cases covering success, failure, and edge cases - Test file existence checking and fallback HTML generation - Test asset path replacement and security content injection - Test complex HTML processing with multiple asset references - All tests passing (108/108)
- Add comprehensive tests for updateButtonConfiguration function - Add ConfigurationTarget to existing __mocks__/vscode.js - Remove duplicate vscode mocking from webview-provider.test.ts - Cover success cases, error handling, and edge cases - All 114 tests passing
…ction - Add 8 test cases covering success/failure/edge cases - Test shortcut handling, group buttons, and mixed configurations - Ensure object reference preservation and empty array handling - All tests passing (122/122)
- Add comprehensive test suite for registerCommands function - Verify all 6 VS Code command registrations - Test command disposable returns and function integration - Export registerCommands function for testability - Complete Phase 2 of testing implementation with 129 total tests
![gemini-code-assist[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/956858?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Summary of Changes
Hello @kubrickcode, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!
This pull request significantly enhances the robustness and maintainability of the extension by integrating a comprehensive unit testing suite using Jest. The core logic across various modules has been refactored to improve testability, leading to the addition of extensive unit tests. These changes ensure higher code quality, easier future development, and a more reliable user experience, while also streamlining the testing process for developers.
Highlights
- Unit Testing Framework: Introduced Jest as the primary unit testing framework for the extension, complete with a dedicated configuration file (
jest.config.js) and a mock for the VS Code API (__mocks__/vscode.js) to enable isolated testing of extension components. - Refactoring for Testability: Refactored several core modules including
adapters,command-executor,command-tree-provider,main,show-all-commands,status-bar-manager,terminal-manager, andwebview-provider. This involved extracting pure functions and reducing coupling to make the code easier to test. - Comprehensive Unit Tests: Added extensive unit tests for the refactored modules, covering key functionalities and edge cases, significantly improving the test coverage and reliability of the extension.
- Development Workflow Improvement: Added a new
testcommand to thejustfilewith options for running tests, watching for changes, and generating coverage reports, streamlining the development and testing workflow. - Dependency Updates: Updated
package.jsonto include necessary development dependencies for Jest and TypeScript testing, and adjustedtsconfig.jsonfor proper type resolution and exclusion of test files from compilation.
Using Gemini Code Assist
The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.
Invoking Gemini
You can request assistance from Gemini at any point in your pull request via creating an issue comment (i.e. comment on the pull request page) using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands.
| Feature | Command | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Code Review | /gemini review |
Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state. |
| Pull Request Summary | /gemini summary |
Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state. |
| Comment | @gemini-code-assist | Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in issue comments and review comments. |
| Help | /gemini help |
Displays a list of available commands. |
Customization
To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.
Limitations & Feedback
Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here.
You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.
Footnotes
-
Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution. ↩
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Code Review
This is an excellent pull request that significantly improves the project's quality and maintainability. The introduction of a comprehensive unit test suite is a huge step forward. The extensive refactoring across the codebase has made the code much more modular, readable, and testable by breaking down large functions and classes into smaller, single-responsibility components. The tests themselves are very well-written, covering a wide range of scenarios and edge cases.
I've added a couple of suggestions to further improve the test coverage and robustness in command-tree-provider.test.ts and main.test.ts. Overall, this is a fantastic contribution. Great work!
|
/gemini review |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Code Review
This pull request is a major and impressive effort to introduce unit testing to the codebase. The refactoring across multiple files to extract pure, testable functions is excellent and greatly improves the maintainability and quality of the code. The added tests are thorough and cover many edge cases. I've found a couple of minor areas for improvement: one related to handling whitespace-only commands and another regarding test coverage for one of the new helper functions. Overall, this is a fantastic contribution.
- Mixed command and group tree items handling
- Correct item types and labels verification
- Empty button array scenario
- Invalid/missing command properties
- Nested group structures
1 participant
No description provided.