Replace security anyhow errors with enum variants

[JulianGCalderon]

Replace some anyhow errors with enum variants

Description

This PR replace some anyhow errors with new enum variants

Checklist

• Linked to Github Issue
• Unit tests added
• Integration tests added.
• This change requires new documentation.
  • Documentation has been added/updated.
  • CHANGELOG has been updated.

[github-actions]

**Hyper Thereading Benchmark results**




hyperfine -r 2 -n "hyper_threading_main threads: 1" 'RAYON_NUM_THREADS=1 ./hyper_threading_main' -n "hyper_threading_pr threads: 1" 'RAYON_NUM_THREADS=1 ./hyper_threading_pr'
Benchmark 1: hyper_threading_main threads: 1
  Time (mean ± σ):     27.500 s ±  0.047 s    [User: 26.734 s, System: 0.765 s]
  Range (min … max):   27.467 s … 27.534 s    2 runs
 
Benchmark 2: hyper_threading_pr threads: 1
  Time (mean ± σ):     27.616 s ±  0.154 s    [User: 26.840 s, System: 0.773 s]
  Range (min … max):   27.507 s … 27.725 s    2 runs
 
Summary
  hyper_threading_main threads: 1 ran
    1.00 ± 0.01 times faster than hyper_threading_pr threads: 1




hyperfine -r 2 -n "hyper_threading_main threads: 2" 'RAYON_NUM_THREADS=2 ./hyper_threading_main' -n "hyper_threading_pr threads: 2" 'RAYON_NUM_THREADS=2 ./hyper_threading_pr'
Benchmark 1: hyper_threading_main threads: 2
  Time (mean ± σ):     15.418 s ±  0.211 s    [User: 26.928 s, System: 0.801 s]
  Range (min … max):   15.269 s … 15.568 s    2 runs
 
Benchmark 2: hyper_threading_pr threads: 2
  Time (mean ± σ):     15.304 s ±  0.043 s    [User: 26.934 s, System: 0.796 s]
  Range (min … max):   15.274 s … 15.334 s    2 runs
 
Summary
  hyper_threading_pr threads: 2 ran
    1.01 ± 0.01 times faster than hyper_threading_main threads: 2




hyperfine -r 2 -n "hyper_threading_main threads: 4" 'RAYON_NUM_THREADS=4 ./hyper_threading_main' -n "hyper_threading_pr threads: 4" 'RAYON_NUM_THREADS=4 ./hyper_threading_pr'
Benchmark 1: hyper_threading_main threads: 4
  Time (mean ± σ):     11.324 s ±  0.568 s    [User: 41.138 s, System: 0.957 s]
  Range (min … max):   10.923 s … 11.726 s    2 runs
 
Benchmark 2: hyper_threading_pr threads: 4
  Time (mean ± σ):     11.169 s ±  0.102 s    [User: 40.280 s, System: 0.951 s]
  Range (min … max):   11.097 s … 11.241 s    2 runs
 
Summary
  hyper_threading_pr threads: 4 ran
    1.01 ± 0.05 times faster than hyper_threading_main threads: 4




hyperfine -r 2 -n "hyper_threading_main threads: 6" 'RAYON_NUM_THREADS=6 ./hyper_threading_main' -n "hyper_threading_pr threads: 6" 'RAYON_NUM_THREADS=6 ./hyper_threading_pr'
Benchmark 1: hyper_threading_main threads: 6
  Time (mean ± σ):     11.049 s ±  0.142 s    [User: 41.335 s, System: 0.983 s]
  Range (min … max):   10.948 s … 11.149 s    2 runs
 
Benchmark 2: hyper_threading_pr threads: 6
  Time (mean ± σ):     11.149 s ±  0.011 s    [User: 40.295 s, System: 0.944 s]
  Range (min … max):   11.142 s … 11.157 s    2 runs
 
Summary
  hyper_threading_main threads: 6 ran
    1.01 ± 0.01 times faster than hyper_threading_pr threads: 6




hyperfine -r 2 -n "hyper_threading_main threads: 8" 'RAYON_NUM_THREADS=8 ./hyper_threading_main' -n "hyper_threading_pr threads: 8" 'RAYON_NUM_THREADS=8 ./hyper_threading_pr'
Benchmark 1: hyper_threading_main threads: 8
  Time (mean ± σ):     11.321 s ±  0.068 s    [User: 41.326 s, System: 0.967 s]
  Range (min … max):   11.273 s … 11.369 s    2 runs
 
Benchmark 2: hyper_threading_pr threads: 8
  Time (mean ± σ):     11.042 s ±  0.130 s    [User: 40.599 s, System: 0.982 s]
  Range (min … max):   10.950 s … 11.134 s    2 runs
 
Summary
  hyper_threading_pr threads: 8 ran
    1.03 ± 0.01 times faster than hyper_threading_main threads: 8




hyperfine -r 2 -n "hyper_threading_main threads: 16" 'RAYON_NUM_THREADS=16 ./hyper_threading_main' -n "hyper_threading_pr threads: 16" 'RAYON_NUM_THREADS=16 ./hyper_threading_pr'
Benchmark 1: hyper_threading_main threads: 16
  Time (mean ± σ):     11.141 s ±  0.226 s    [User: 41.694 s, System: 1.092 s]
  Range (min … max):   10.980 s … 11.301 s    2 runs
 
Benchmark 2: hyper_threading_pr threads: 16
  Time (mean ± σ):     10.896 s ±  0.010 s    [User: 41.299 s, System: 1.115 s]
  Range (min … max):   10.889 s … 10.903 s    2 runs
 
Summary
  hyper_threading_pr threads: 16 ran
    1.02 ± 0.02 times faster than hyper_threading_main threads: 16

[github-actions]

Benchmark Results for unmodified programs 🚀

Command	Mean [s]	Min [s]	Max [s]	Relative
base big_factorial	2.233 ± 0.036	2.203	2.332	1.01 ± 0.02
head big_factorial	2.208 ± 0.036	2.175	2.303	1.00

Command	Mean [s]	Min [s]	Max [s]	Relative
base big_fibonacci	2.168 ± 0.007	2.160	2.183	1.01 ± 0.01
head big_fibonacci	2.139 ± 0.023	2.114	2.190	1.00

Command	Mean [s]	Min [s]	Max [s]	Relative
base blake2s_integration_benchmark	8.249 ± 0.176	8.150	8.745	1.00 ± 0.03
head blake2s_integration_benchmark	8.246 ± 0.184	8.032	8.545	1.00

Command	Mean [s]	Min [s]	Max [s]	Relative
base compare_arrays_200000	2.305 ± 0.042	2.270	2.413	1.01 ± 0.02
head compare_arrays_200000	2.292 ± 0.032	2.250	2.348	1.00

Command	Mean [s]	Min [s]	Max [s]	Relative
base dict_integration_benchmark	1.477 ± 0.006	1.466	1.485	1.00
head dict_integration_benchmark	1.491 ± 0.009	1.476	1.513	1.01 ± 0.01

Command	Mean [s]	Min [s]	Max [s]	Relative
base field_arithmetic_get_square_benchmark	1.282 ± 0.003	1.279	1.286	1.00
head field_arithmetic_get_square_benchmark	1.295 ± 0.008	1.290	1.314	1.01 ± 0.01

Command	Mean [s]	Min [s]	Max [s]	Relative
base integration_builtins	8.225 ± 0.031	8.175	8.276	1.00
head integration_builtins	8.374 ± 0.162	8.092	8.582	1.02 ± 0.02

Command	Mean [s]	Min [s]	Max [s]	Relative
base keccak_integration_benchmark	8.498 ± 0.058	8.451	8.654	1.00
head keccak_integration_benchmark	8.530 ± 0.195	8.326	8.802	1.00 ± 0.02

Command	Mean [s]	Min [s]	Max [s]	Relative
base linear_search	2.261 ± 0.006	2.254	2.268	1.00
head linear_search	2.267 ± 0.057	2.227	2.423	1.00 ± 0.03

Command	Mean [s]	Min [s]	Max [s]	Relative
base math_cmp_and_pow_integration_benchmark	1.579 ± 0.023	1.565	1.644	1.01 ± 0.02
head math_cmp_and_pow_integration_benchmark	1.563 ± 0.007	1.551	1.572	1.00

Command	Mean [s]	Min [s]	Max [s]	Relative
base math_integration_benchmark	1.527 ± 0.014	1.512	1.559	1.01 ± 0.01
head math_integration_benchmark	1.517 ± 0.006	1.509	1.528	1.00

Command	Mean [s]	Min [s]	Max [s]	Relative
base memory_integration_benchmark	1.254 ± 0.007	1.245	1.266	1.00
head memory_integration_benchmark	1.260 ± 0.004	1.253	1.268	1.00 ± 0.01

Command	Mean [s]	Min [s]	Max [s]	Relative
base operations_with_data_structures_benchmarks	1.626 ± 0.006	1.617	1.636	1.00
head operations_with_data_structures_benchmarks	1.640 ± 0.009	1.623	1.657	1.01 ± 0.01

Command	Mean [ms]	Min [ms]	Max [ms]	Relative
base pedersen	547.4 ± 1.3	545.9	550.1	1.00 ± 0.00
head pedersen	544.9 ± 2.4	541.3	548.5	1.00

Command	Mean [ms]	Min [ms]	Max [ms]	Relative
base poseidon_integration_benchmark	647.7 ± 5.8	639.5	656.2	1.00
head poseidon_integration_benchmark	662.5 ± 5.7	654.8	670.4	1.02 ± 0.01

Command	Mean [s]	Min [s]	Max [s]	Relative
base secp_integration_benchmark	1.898 ± 0.007	1.891	1.913	1.00
head secp_integration_benchmark	1.904 ± 0.012	1.885	1.918	1.00 ± 0.01

Command	Mean [ms]	Min [ms]	Max [ms]	Relative
base set_integration_benchmark	673.1 ± 4.3	668.6	683.4	1.00
head set_integration_benchmark	703.2 ± 10.4	689.4	714.4	1.04 ± 0.02

Command	Mean [s]	Min [s]	Max [s]	Relative
base uint256_integration_benchmark	4.513 ± 0.016	4.485	4.537	1.00
head uint256_integration_benchmark	4.555 ± 0.127	4.420	4.893	1.01 ± 0.03

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 96.35%. Comparing base (a24c1b8) to head (afaf0e3).

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #1946      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   96.37%   96.35%   -0.02%     
==========================================
  Files         102      102              
  Lines       41245    41227      -18     
==========================================
- Hits        39749    39726      -23     
- Misses       1496     1501       +5     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.