Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

CID-3107: React to manifest file deletion via Webhook #33

Conversation

kostas-petrakis
Copy link
Contributor

@kostas-petrakis kostas-petrakis commented Nov 4, 2024

  • Added location for logs
  • Added manifest file path in payload

πŸ›  Changes made

Please explain here the changes you made in this PR.

✨ Type of change

Please delete the options that are not relevant.

  • New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)

πŸ§ͺ How Has This Been Tested?

Please describe the tests that you ran to verify your changes.

  • should handle manifest file in subdirectory

🏎 Checklist:

  • My code follows the style guidelines
  • I have performed a self-review of my own code
  • I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
  • Any dependent changes have been merged and published in downstream modules
  • I have made corresponding changes to the documentation (README.md)
  • My commit message clearly reflects the changes made
  • Assigned the appropriate labels (version, PR type, etc.)

- Added location for logs
- Added manifest file path in payload
@kostas-petrakis kostas-petrakis requested a review from a team as a code owner November 4, 2024 14:17
@kostas-petrakis kostas-petrakis added the enhancement New feature or request label Nov 4, 2024
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Nov 4, 2024

LeanIX GitHub Agent Code Coverage

File Coverage [96.6%] 🍏
WebhookEventService.kt 96.6% 🍏
Total Project Coverage 70.91% 🍏

@kostas-petrakis kostas-petrakis self-assigned this Nov 4, 2024
@kostas-petrakis kostas-petrakis merged commit cc47fb5 into main Nov 5, 2024
4 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants