Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

chore: remove trivial from get_elem_tactic #5986

Closed
wants to merge 3 commits into from

Conversation

kim-em
Copy link
Collaborator

@kim-em kim-em commented Nov 7, 2024

This PR removes the call to trivial in get_elem_tactic_trivial, as this is already covered by the hard-coded high priority call to assumption in get_elem_tactic.

@kim-em kim-em added the awaiting-mathlib We should not merge this until we have a successful Mathlib build label Nov 7, 2024
@kim-em kim-em marked this pull request as draft November 7, 2024 04:36
@github-actions github-actions bot added the toolchain-available A toolchain is available for this PR, at leanprover/lean4-pr-releases:pr-release-NNNN label Nov 7, 2024
leanprover-community-mathlib4-bot added a commit to leanprover-community/batteries that referenced this pull request Nov 7, 2024
leanprover-community-mathlib4-bot added a commit to leanprover-community/mathlib4 that referenced this pull request Nov 7, 2024
@kim-em
Copy link
Collaborator Author

kim-em commented Nov 7, 2024

Nope, nothing to see here!

@kim-em kim-em closed this Nov 7, 2024
@leanprover-community-bot leanprover-community-bot added builds-mathlib CI has verified that Mathlib builds against this PR and removed awaiting-mathlib We should not merge this until we have a successful Mathlib build labels Nov 7, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
builds-mathlib CI has verified that Mathlib builds against this PR toolchain-available A toolchain is available for this PR, at leanprover/lean4-pr-releases:pr-release-NNNN
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants