[draft] refactor for readable and add tests #18
Conversation
|
The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎
|
Reviewer's Guide by SourceryThis pull request refactors the VNPay module for better readability and modularity. Key changes include moving URL creation and secure hash calculation to separate utility functions, enhancing existing utility functions with additional parameters, and adding new tests. The jest configuration was also updated to enforce a minimum of 80% line coverage. File-Level Changes
Tips
|
WalkthroughThe recent changes significantly enhance project configuration and utility functions, with a strong emphasis on code quality, maintainability, and testing. Key updates include the addition of Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)sequenceDiagram
participant User
participant VNPay
participant PaymentUtil
participant Logger
User->>VNPay: Initiates payment
VNPay->>PaymentUtil: Generates payment URL
PaymentUtil-->>VNPay: Returns payment URL
VNPay->>Logger: Logs payment initiation
Logger-->>VNPay: Confirms log
VNPay->>User: Returns payment link
sequenceDiagram
participant User
participant VNPay
participant PaymentUtil
participant Logger
User->>VNPay: Verifies return URL
VNPay->>PaymentUtil: Validates secure hash
PaymentUtil-->>VNPay: Returns validation result
VNPay->>Logger: Logs verification result
Logger-->>VNPay: Confirms log
VNPay->>User: Returns verification status
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)
Additionally, you can add CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![sourcery-ai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/48477?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Hey @lehuygiang28 - I've reviewed your changes and found some issues that need to be addressed.
Blocking issues:
- Timing attack vulnerability. (link)
Here's what I looked at during the review
- 🟡 General issues: 7 issues found
- 🔴 Security: 1 blocking issue
- 🟢 Testing: all looks good
- 🟢 Complexity: all looks good
- 🟢 Documentation: all looks good
Help me be more useful! Please click 👍 or 👎 on each comment to tell me if it was helpful.
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 4
Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: ASSERTIVE
Files selected for processing (15)
- .eslintignore (1 hunks)
- .gitignore (1 hunks)
- .npmignore (1 hunks)
- .prettierignore (1 hunks)
- jest.config.ts (1 hunks)
- package.json (1 hunks)
- src/utils/common.ts (3 hunks)
- src/utils/index.ts (1 hunks)
- src/utils/logger.ts (2 hunks)
- src/utils/payment.util.ts (1 hunks)
- src/vnpay.ts (3 hunks)
- test/utils/common.test.ts (1 hunks)
- test/utils/logger.test.ts (1 hunks)
- test/utils/payment-util.test.ts (1 hunks)
- test/verify-return-url.test.ts (1 hunks)
Additional context used
Path-based instructions (10)
src/utils/index.ts (1)
Pattern
**/*.ts: Review the TypeScript code of the NPM package to ensure it adheres to the principles of awesome and clean code. This includes proper use of functions, classes, modules. Also, ensure the code follows best practices for package development, such as clear and concise documentation, proper error handling, and efficient data structures and algorithms. The code should also conform to the ESLint rules configured in the codebase. Highlight any deviations and suggest appropriate corrections. Using design patterns that promote code reusability and readability is encouraged.jest.config.ts (1)
Pattern
**/*.ts: Review the TypeScript code of the NPM package to ensure it adheres to the principles of awesome and clean code. This includes proper use of functions, classes, modules. Also, ensure the code follows best practices for package development, such as clear and concise documentation, proper error handling, and efficient data structures and algorithms. The code should also conform to the ESLint rules configured in the codebase. Highlight any deviations and suggest appropriate corrections. Using design patterns that promote code reusability and readability is encouraged.src/utils/logger.ts (1)
Pattern
**/*.ts: Review the TypeScript code of the NPM package to ensure it adheres to the principles of awesome and clean code. This includes proper use of functions, classes, modules. Also, ensure the code follows best practices for package development, such as clear and concise documentation, proper error handling, and efficient data structures and algorithms. The code should also conform to the ESLint rules configured in the codebase. Highlight any deviations and suggest appropriate corrections. Using design patterns that promote code reusability and readability is encouraged.src/utils/payment.util.ts (1)
Pattern
**/*.ts: Review the TypeScript code of the NPM package to ensure it adheres to the principles of awesome and clean code. This includes proper use of functions, classes, modules. Also, ensure the code follows best practices for package development, such as clear and concise documentation, proper error handling, and efficient data structures and algorithms. The code should also conform to the ESLint rules configured in the codebase. Highlight any deviations and suggest appropriate corrections. Using design patterns that promote code reusability and readability is encouraged.test/utils/logger.test.ts (2)
Pattern
**/*.ts: Review the TypeScript code of the NPM package to ensure it adheres to the principles of awesome and clean code. This includes proper use of functions, classes, modules. Also, ensure the code follows best practices for package development, such as clear and concise documentation, proper error handling, and efficient data structures and algorithms. The code should also conform to the ESLint rules configured in the codebase. Highlight any deviations and suggest appropriate corrections. Using design patterns that promote code reusability and readability is encouraged.
Pattern
test/**/*: Review the test files to ensure they cover all the relevant use cases and edge cases of the codebase. Check for proper test coverage, assertions, and error handling. Ensure that the tests are well-organized, easy to read, and provide meaningful feedback. Highlight any missing or redundant tests and suggest improvements to enhance the overall quality of the test suite.src/utils/common.ts (1)
Pattern
**/*.ts: Review the TypeScript code of the NPM package to ensure it adheres to the principles of awesome and clean code. This includes proper use of functions, classes, modules. Also, ensure the code follows best practices for package development, such as clear and concise documentation, proper error handling, and efficient data structures and algorithms. The code should also conform to the ESLint rules configured in the codebase. Highlight any deviations and suggest appropriate corrections. Using design patterns that promote code reusability and readability is encouraged.test/utils/payment-util.test.ts (2)
Pattern
**/*.ts: Review the TypeScript code of the NPM package to ensure it adheres to the principles of awesome and clean code. This includes proper use of functions, classes, modules. Also, ensure the code follows best practices for package development, such as clear and concise documentation, proper error handling, and efficient data structures and algorithms. The code should also conform to the ESLint rules configured in the codebase. Highlight any deviations and suggest appropriate corrections. Using design patterns that promote code reusability and readability is encouraged.
Pattern
test/**/*: Review the test files to ensure they cover all the relevant use cases and edge cases of the codebase. Check for proper test coverage, assertions, and error handling. Ensure that the tests are well-organized, easy to read, and provide meaningful feedback. Highlight any missing or redundant tests and suggest improvements to enhance the overall quality of the test suite.test/utils/common.test.ts (2)
Pattern
**/*.ts: Review the TypeScript code of the NPM package to ensure it adheres to the principles of awesome and clean code. This includes proper use of functions, classes, modules. Also, ensure the code follows best practices for package development, such as clear and concise documentation, proper error handling, and efficient data structures and algorithms. The code should also conform to the ESLint rules configured in the codebase. Highlight any deviations and suggest appropriate corrections. Using design patterns that promote code reusability and readability is encouraged.
Pattern
test/**/*: Review the test files to ensure they cover all the relevant use cases and edge cases of the codebase. Check for proper test coverage, assertions, and error handling. Ensure that the tests are well-organized, easy to read, and provide meaningful feedback. Highlight any missing or redundant tests and suggest improvements to enhance the overall quality of the test suite.test/verify-return-url.test.ts (2)
Pattern
**/*.ts: Review the TypeScript code of the NPM package to ensure it adheres to the principles of awesome and clean code. This includes proper use of functions, classes, modules. Also, ensure the code follows best practices for package development, such as clear and concise documentation, proper error handling, and efficient data structures and algorithms. The code should also conform to the ESLint rules configured in the codebase. Highlight any deviations and suggest appropriate corrections. Using design patterns that promote code reusability and readability is encouraged.
Pattern
test/**/*: Review the test files to ensure they cover all the relevant use cases and edge cases of the codebase. Check for proper test coverage, assertions, and error handling. Ensure that the tests are well-organized, easy to read, and provide meaningful feedback. Highlight any missing or redundant tests and suggest improvements to enhance the overall quality of the test suite.src/vnpay.ts (1)
Pattern
**/*.ts: Review the TypeScript code of the NPM package to ensure it adheres to the principles of awesome and clean code. This includes proper use of functions, classes, modules. Also, ensure the code follows best practices for package development, such as clear and concise documentation, proper error handling, and efficient data structures and algorithms. The code should also conform to the ESLint rules configured in the codebase. Highlight any deviations and suggest appropriate corrections. Using design patterns that promote code reusability and readability is encouraged.
Biome
test/utils/logger.test.ts
[error] 38-38: Template literals are preferred over string concatenation.
Unsafe fix: Use a template literal.
(lint/style/useTemplate)
[error] 52-52: Template literals are preferred over string concatenation.
Unsafe fix: Use a template literal.
(lint/style/useTemplate)
[error] 64-64: Template literals are preferred over string concatenation.
Unsafe fix: Use a template literal.
(lint/style/useTemplate)
Additional comments not posted (52)
.gitignore (1)
4-5: LGTM! Standard practice for ignoring sensitive and extraneous data.The additions of
.envandcoverage/are good practices to avoid committing sensitive information and extraneous data to the repository.src/utils/index.ts (1)
3-3: LGTM! Enhances code organization and modularity.The addition of
export * from './payment.util';centralizes and streamlines utility functions, improving code organization and modularity..npmignore (1)
6-6: LGTM! Maintains a cleaner package distribution.The addition of
coverage/ensures that coverage reports are not included in the npm package, maintaining a cleaner package distribution..prettierignore (1)
4-4: LGTM! Addingcoverage/to.prettierignoreis a good practice.This change ensures that autogenerated test coverage reports are excluded from formatting checks.
.eslintignore (1)
4-4: LGTM! Addingcoverage/to.eslintignoreis a good practice.This change ensures that autogenerated test coverage reports are excluded from linting checks.
jest.config.ts (1)
4-8: LGTM! AddingcoverageThresholdto Jest configuration is a good practice.This change enforces a minimum global line coverage of 80%, which helps maintain code quality.
src/utils/logger.ts (1)
17-20: LGTM! But verify the function usage in the codebase.The code changes are approved.
However, ensure that all function calls to
consoleLoggermatch the new signature.Verification successful
All function calls to
consoleLoggermatch the new signature.The code changes are approved.
Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify all function calls to `consoleLogger` match the new signature. # Test: Search for the function usage. Expect: Only occurrences of the new signature. rg --type ts -A 5 $'consoleLogger'Length of output: 5512
package.json (1)
19-19: Good addition!The new script command for running tests with coverage reporting is a good practice.
src/utils/payment.util.ts (4)
6-18: Well-implemented URL search parameters builder.The function correctly handles the creation of URL search parameters and skips empty values.
20-34: Well-implemented payment URL creator.The function correctly constructs the URL and appends the search parameters.
36-43: Well-implemented secure hash calculator.The function correctly calculates the secure hash.
45-53: Well-implemented secure hash verifier.The function correctly verifies the secure hash.
test/utils/logger.test.ts (3)
11-13: LGTM!The test case correctly verifies that
ignoreLoggerreturnsundefined.
15-20: LGTM!The test case correctly verifies that
consoleLoggerlogs data to the console usingjest.spyOn.
22-27: LGTM!The test case correctly verifies that
consoleLoggerlogs data to the console with a specific symbol usingjest.spyOn.src/utils/common.ts (6)
6-9: LGTM!The changes to the
getDateInGMT7function improve its flexibility by allowing an optionaldateparameter. The implementation is correct and adheres to best practices.
Line range hint
45-57:
LGTM!The changes to the
parseDatefunction enhance its utility by accommodating different timezone requirements. The implementation is correct and adheres to best practices.Tools
Biome
[error] 52-52: Use Number.parseInt instead of the equivalent global.
ES2015 moved some globals into the Number namespace for consistency.
Safe fix: Use Number.parseInt instead.(lint/style/useNumberNamespace)
[error] 53-53: Use Number.parseInt instead of the equivalent global.
ES2015 moved some globals into the Number namespace for consistency.
Safe fix: Use Number.parseInt instead.(lint/style/useNumberNamespace)
Line range hint
12-26:
LGTM!The
dateFormatfunction is correctly implemented and adheres to best practices.
Line range hint
62-67:
LGTM!The
isValidVnpayDateFormatfunction is correctly implemented and adheres to best practices.
Line range hint
69-80:
LGTM!The
generateRandomStringfunction is correctly implemented and adheres to best practices.
Line range hint
82-92:
LGTM!The
getResponseByStatusCodefunction is correctly implemented and adheres to best practices.test/utils/payment-util.test.ts (4)
11-31: LGTM!The test cases for
buildPaymentUrlSearchParamsare correctly implemented and cover the expected behavior.
34-62: LGTM!The test cases for
createPaymentUrlare correctly implemented and cover the expected behavior.
64-74: LGTM!The test case for
calculateSecureHashis correctly implemented and covers the expected behavior.
76-86: LGTM!The test case for
verifySecureHashis correctly implemented and covers the expected behavior.test/utils/common.test.ts (10)
19-24: LGTM!The test case for
getDateInGMT7is well-written and covers the intended functionality.
35-46: LGTM!The test cases for
parseDateare well-written and cover both number and string inputs.
49-58: LGTM!The test cases for
isValidVnpayDateFormatare well-written and cover both valid and invalid dates.
61-72: LGTM!The test cases for
generateRandomStringare well-written and cover both default and numeric-only strings.
75-93: LGTM!The test cases for
getResponseByStatusCodeare well-written and cover different response codes and default behavior.
96-113: LGTM!The test case for
resolveUrlStringis well-written and covers the intended functionality.
116-125: LGTM!The test case for
hashis well-written and covers the intended functionality.
39-72: LGTM!The test cases for
verifyReturnUrlare well-written and cover various scenarios including valid, invalid, and edge cases.Also applies to: 74-94, 96-147
Line range hint
149-152:
LGTM!The test case for invalid amount in
verifyReturnUrlis well-written and covers the intended functionality.
Line range hint
165-186:
LGTM!The test cases for logging in
verifyReturnUrlare well-written and cover both default and secure hash logging.Also applies to: 188-211
test/verify-return-url.test.ts (9)
39-72: LGTM!The test case for correct data with valid input is well-written and covers the intended functionality.
74-94: LGTM!The test cases for amount divided by 100 are well-written and cover various input amounts.
96-107: LGTM!The test case for correct success result is well-written and covers the intended functionality.
109-127: LGTM!The test case for correct failed result is well-written and covers the intended functionality.
130-147: LGTM!The test case for correct failed result with invalid secure hash is well-written and covers the intended functionality.
149-152: LGTM!The test case for invalid amount error is well-written and covers the intended functionality.
154-163: LGTM!The test case for converting
vnp_Amountfrom string to number is well-written and covers the intended functionality.
165-186: LGTM!The test case for logging the object to the console is well-written and covers the intended functionality.
188-211: LGTM!The test case for logging the object to the console with secure hash is well-written and covers the intended functionality.
src/vnpay.ts (8)
54-59: LGTM!The import statements for new utility functions are correct and necessary for the refactored code.
194-197: LGTM!The refactoring of the
buildPaymentUrlmethod improves readability and maintainability. The comment explaining the multiplication ofvnp_Amountprovides useful context.Also applies to: 205-207, 209-211
246-250: LGTM!The refactoring of the
verifyReturnUrlmethod improves readability and maintainability. The validation logic is clear and concise.Also applies to: 256-262, 265-273
Line range hint
334-336:
LGTM!The refactoring of the
queryDrmethod improves readability and maintainability. The error handling is clear and concise.Also applies to: 338-340
Line range hint
455-457:
LGTM!The refactoring of the
refundmethod improves readability and maintainability. The error handling is clear and concise.Also applies to: 459-461
Line range hint
521-523:
LGTM!The
logDatamethod is well-written and covers the intended functionality.Also applies to: 525-527
Line range hint
64-66:
LGTM!The constructor is well-written and covers the intended functionality.
Also applies to: 68-70
Line range hint
48-50:
LGTM!The class properties are well-defined and cover the intended functionality.
Also applies to: 52-54
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: ASSERTIVE
Files selected for processing (1)
- src/utils/common.ts (3 hunks)
Additional context used
Path-based instructions (1)
src/utils/common.ts (1)
Pattern
**/*.ts: Review the TypeScript code of the NPM package to ensure it adheres to the principles of awesome and clean code. This includes proper use of functions, classes, modules. Also, ensure the code follows best practices for package development, such as clear and concise documentation, proper error handling, and efficient data structures and algorithms. The code should also conform to the ESLint rules configured in the codebase. Highlight any deviations and suggest appropriate corrections. Using design patterns that promote code reusability and readability is encouraged.
Additional comments not posted (2)
src/utils/common.ts (2)
6-7: LGTM! The optional date parameter improves usability.The use of the nullish coalescing operator ensures that the function handles
undefinedvalues gracefully.
Line range hint
43-55:
LGTM! The optional timezone parameter improves flexibility.The function now supports parsing dates in both local and UTC timezones. Ensure that the function documentation is updated to reflect the new parameter.
Tools
Biome
[error] 50-50: Use Number.parseInt instead of the equivalent global.
ES2015 moved some globals into the Number namespace for consistency.
Safe fix: Use Number.parseInt instead.(lint/style/useNumberNamespace)
[error] 51-51: Use Number.parseInt instead of the equivalent global.
ES2015 moved some globals into the Number namespace for consistency.
Safe fix: Use Number.parseInt instead.(lint/style/useNumberNamespace)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 3
Outside diff range comments (1)
src/utils/common.ts (1)
Line range hint
43-63:
Remove the redundant case clause.The
case 'local'is redundant because the default clause handles it.switch (tz) { case 'utc': return utc([year, month, day, hour, minute, second]).toDate(); case 'gmt7': return getDateInGMT7(new Date(year, month, day, hour, minute, second)); - case 'local': default: return new Date(year, month, day, hour, minute, second); }Tools
Biome
[error] 62-63: Useless case clause.
because the default clause is present:
Unsafe fix: Remove the useless case.
(lint/complexity/noUselessSwitchCase)
[error] 53-53: Use Number.parseInt instead of the equivalent global.
ES2015 moved some globals into the Number namespace for consistency.
Safe fix: Use Number.parseInt instead.(lint/style/useNumberNamespace)
[error] 54-54: Use Number.parseInt instead of the equivalent global.
ES2015 moved some globals into the Number namespace for consistency.
Safe fix: Use Number.parseInt instead.(lint/style/useNumberNamespace)
Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: ASSERTIVE
Files selected for processing (3)
- src/utils/common.ts (3 hunks)
- src/vnpay.ts (5 hunks)
- test/utils/common.test.ts (1 hunks)
Additional context used
Path-based instructions (3)
src/utils/common.ts (1)
Pattern
**/*.ts: Review the TypeScript code of the NPM package to ensure it adheres to the principles of awesome and clean code. This includes proper use of functions, classes, modules. Also, ensure the code follows best practices for package development, such as clear and concise documentation, proper error handling, and efficient data structures and algorithms. The code should also conform to the ESLint rules configured in the codebase. Highlight any deviations and suggest appropriate corrections. Using design patterns that promote code reusability and readability is encouraged.test/utils/common.test.ts (2)
Pattern
**/*.ts: Review the TypeScript code of the NPM package to ensure it adheres to the principles of awesome and clean code. This includes proper use of functions, classes, modules. Also, ensure the code follows best practices for package development, such as clear and concise documentation, proper error handling, and efficient data structures and algorithms. The code should also conform to the ESLint rules configured in the codebase. Highlight any deviations and suggest appropriate corrections. Using design patterns that promote code reusability and readability is encouraged.
Pattern
test/**/*: Review the test files to ensure they cover all the relevant use cases and edge cases of the codebase. Check for proper test coverage, assertions, and error handling. Ensure that the tests are well-organized, easy to read, and provide meaningful feedback. Highlight any missing or redundant tests and suggest improvements to enhance the overall quality of the test suite.src/vnpay.ts (1)
Pattern
**/*.ts: Review the TypeScript code of the NPM package to ensure it adheres to the principles of awesome and clean code. This includes proper use of functions, classes, modules. Also, ensure the code follows best practices for package development, such as clear and concise documentation, proper error handling, and efficient data structures and algorithms. The code should also conform to the ESLint rules configured in the codebase. Highlight any deviations and suggest appropriate corrections. Using design patterns that promote code reusability and readability is encouraged.
Biome
src/utils/common.ts
[error] 62-63: Useless case clause.
because the default clause is present:
Unsafe fix: Remove the useless case.
(lint/complexity/noUselessSwitchCase)
Additional comments not posted (9)
src/utils/common.ts (1)
6-7: LGTM!The update to accept an optional
dateparameter improves the function's usability.test/utils/common.test.ts (6)
20-25: LGTM!The test case for
getDateInGMT7correctly verifies the expected behavior.
36-47: LGTM!The test cases for
parseDatecorrectly verify the expected behavior for both number and string inputs.
50-59: LGTM!The test cases for
isValidVnpayDateFormatcorrectly verify the expected behavior.
62-73: LGTM!The test cases for
generateRandomStringcorrectly verify the expected behavior.
76-94: LGTM!The test cases for
getResponseByStatusCodecorrectly verify the expected behavior.
97-127: LGTM!The test cases for
resolveUrlStringandhashcorrectly verify the expected behavior.src/vnpay.ts (2)
273-273: LGTM!The refactoring improves readability and maintainability. The method handles errors appropriately.
273-273: LGTM!The refactoring improves readability and maintainability. The method handles errors appropriately.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 6
Outside diff range comments (1)
src/utils/common.ts (1)
Line range hint
45-70:
Remove the useless case clause.The case clause for
'local'is redundant because the default clause handles it. Removing it simplifies the switch statement.switch (tz) { case 'utc': return new Date( utc([year, month, day, hour, minute, second], true).format( 'YYYY-MM-DDTHH:mm:ss.SSS[Z]', ), ); case 'gmt7': return getDateInGMT7(new Date(year, month, day, hour, minute, second)); - case 'local': default: return new Date(year, month, day, hour, minute, second); }Tools
Biome
[error] 68-69: Useless case clause.
because the default clause is present:
Unsafe fix: Remove the useless case.
(lint/complexity/noUselessSwitchCase)
[error] 55-55: Use Number.parseInt instead of the equivalent global.
ES2015 moved some globals into the Number namespace for consistency.
Safe fix: Use Number.parseInt instead.(lint/style/useNumberNamespace)
[error] 56-56: Use Number.parseInt instead of the equivalent global.
ES2015 moved some globals into the Number namespace for consistency.
Safe fix: Use Number.parseInt instead.(lint/style/useNumberNamespace)
Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: ASSERTIVE
Files selected for processing (4)
- jest.config.ts (1 hunks)
- src/utils/common.ts (3 hunks)
- test/build-payment-url.test.ts (2 hunks)
- test/utils/common.test.ts (1 hunks)
Additional context used
Path-based instructions (4)
jest.config.ts (1)
Pattern
**/*.ts: Review the TypeScript code of the NPM package to ensure it adheres to the principles of awesome and clean code. This includes proper use of functions, classes, modules. Also, ensure the code follows best practices for package development, such as clear and concise documentation, proper error handling, and efficient data structures and algorithms. The code should also conform to the ESLint rules configured in the codebase. Highlight any deviations and suggest appropriate corrections. Using design patterns that promote code reusability and readability is encouraged.src/utils/common.ts (1)
Pattern
**/*.ts: Review the TypeScript code of the NPM package to ensure it adheres to the principles of awesome and clean code. This includes proper use of functions, classes, modules. Also, ensure the code follows best practices for package development, such as clear and concise documentation, proper error handling, and efficient data structures and algorithms. The code should also conform to the ESLint rules configured in the codebase. Highlight any deviations and suggest appropriate corrections. Using design patterns that promote code reusability and readability is encouraged.test/utils/common.test.ts (2)
Pattern
**/*.ts: Review the TypeScript code of the NPM package to ensure it adheres to the principles of awesome and clean code. This includes proper use of functions, classes, modules. Also, ensure the code follows best practices for package development, such as clear and concise documentation, proper error handling, and efficient data structures and algorithms. The code should also conform to the ESLint rules configured in the codebase. Highlight any deviations and suggest appropriate corrections. Using design patterns that promote code reusability and readability is encouraged.
Pattern
test/**/*: Review the test files to ensure they cover all the relevant use cases and edge cases of the codebase. Check for proper test coverage, assertions, and error handling. Ensure that the tests are well-organized, easy to read, and provide meaningful feedback. Highlight any missing or redundant tests and suggest improvements to enhance the overall quality of the test suite.test/build-payment-url.test.ts (2)
Pattern
**/*.ts: Review the TypeScript code of the NPM package to ensure it adheres to the principles of awesome and clean code. This includes proper use of functions, classes, modules. Also, ensure the code follows best practices for package development, such as clear and concise documentation, proper error handling, and efficient data structures and algorithms. The code should also conform to the ESLint rules configured in the codebase. Highlight any deviations and suggest appropriate corrections. Using design patterns that promote code reusability and readability is encouraged.
Pattern
test/**/*: Review the test files to ensure they cover all the relevant use cases and edge cases of the codebase. Check for proper test coverage, assertions, and error handling. Ensure that the tests are well-organized, easy to read, and provide meaningful feedback. Highlight any missing or redundant tests and suggest improvements to enhance the overall quality of the test suite.
Biome
src/utils/common.ts
[error] 68-69: Useless case clause.
because the default clause is present:
Unsafe fix: Remove the useless case.
(lint/complexity/noUselessSwitchCase)
Additional comments not posted (3)
src/utils/common.ts (1)
6-9: LGTM!The changes to
getDateInGMT7improve flexibility by allowing an optional date parameter.test/build-payment-url.test.ts (2)
4-4: LGTM! Import statement updated correctly.The import statement now includes the
getDateInGMT7function, which is appropriate for handling date in GMT+7 timezone.
150-150: LGTM! Test case updated to usegetDateInGMT7.The test case now uses
getDateInGMT7to handle the current date correctly in the GMT+7 timezone.
|
@coderabbitai review |
Actions performedReview triggered.
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: ASSERTIVE
Files selected for processing (1)
- .coderabbit.yaml (1 hunks)
Additional comments not posted (1)
.coderabbit.yaml (1)
4-4: Enhancement: Added tone instructions for feedback customization.The addition of the
tone_instructionsfield enhances the configuration by allowing users to customize the feedback tone, improving the relevance and usability of the output for various contexts.
lehuygiang28
changed the title
Summary by Sourcery
This pull request refactors the VNPay class for better readability and maintainability, enhances date handling and logging utilities, and adds new tests to cover the changes.
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Chores