Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Re-add return type variable for Component #598

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Jan 11, 2025

Conversation

mdekstrand
Copy link
Member

This brings back the return type generic variable for Component, which was removed in #596 but was important for the type-safety of the Pipeline interface. It also fills this variable in for our component implementations.

@mdekstrand mdekstrand added the pipeline LensKit pipeline abstraction label Jan 11, 2025
@mdekstrand mdekstrand added this to the 2025.1 milestone Jan 11, 2025
@mdekstrand mdekstrand self-assigned this Jan 11, 2025
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jan 11, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 89.96%. Comparing base (d1afbcb) to head (204dcee).
Report is 2 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main     #598      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   89.96%   89.96%   -0.01%     
==========================================
  Files         106      106              
  Lines        6568     6567       -1     
==========================================
- Hits         5909     5908       -1     
  Misses        659      659              

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@mdekstrand mdekstrand merged commit 204dcee into lenskit:main Jan 11, 2025
39 checks passed
@mdekstrand mdekstrand deleted the feature/component-type-var branch January 11, 2025 19:36
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
pipeline LensKit pipeline abstraction
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant