Resolve Labeling Conflict: Assign Unique Colors to a Tooth and Gingiva Labels #21
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Description: Addressed a bug in the get_colored_mesh function that was causing the same color to be assigned to both gingiva and a tooth in certain cases.
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
I identified a potential issue in the labeling system where taking the modulo operation (%17) with each array element resulted in a lack of distinction between gingiva and Lower Left 4 (LL4). Specifically, when the FDI system assigned 34 to LL4, taking 34%17 resulted in 0, causing overlap with the gingiva label. It'll cause an exact issue with UR7. To rectify this, I have made adjustments to ensure a distinction between these elements in our predictions. This improvement aims to enhance the accuracy and specificity of our labeling system.
Issue:
Fixed:
