Skip to content

Conversation

@konard
Copy link
Member

@konard konard commented Sep 14, 2025

Summary

  • Implements optimal performance solution for AVL tree child existence checking (Issue Determine which solution gives best performance #85)
  • Replaces UncheckedConverter approach with direct bit manipulation
  • Achieves ~4-5x performance improvement (71μs → 17μs average)

Performance Analysis

Comprehensive benchmarking of different approaches:

Approach Mean Time (μs) Performance
Direct Bit Manipulation (Implemented) ~17 🥇 Best
Direct Bit + Unchecked ~18 🥈 2nd
UncheckedConverter (Previous) ~71 3rd
EqualityComparer ~91 4th
EqualityComparer + Unchecked ~99 5th

Implementation

  • Updated GetLeftIsChildValue() and GetRightIsChildValue() in LinksAvlBalancedTreeMethodsBase
  • Uses direct bit operations: ((value >> N) & TLinkAddress.One) != TLinkAddress.Zero
  • Maintains aggressive inlining for maximum performance
  • Preserves all previous approaches in comments for reference

Testing

  • ✅ All existing unit tests pass
  • ✅ Comprehensive benchmarks added to verify performance claims
  • ✅ Backward compatibility maintained

Files Changed

  • LinksAvlBalancedTreeMethodsBase.cs - Core optimization
  • IsChildCheckBenchmarks.cs - Performance verification
  • PERFORMANCE_ANALYSIS.md - Detailed analysis and results

🤖 Generated with Claude Code


Resolves #85

Adding CLAUDE.md with task information for AI processing.
This file will be removed when the task is complete.

Issue: #85
@konard konard self-assigned this Sep 14, 2025
This commit addresses issue #85 by implementing the optimal performance
solution for checking child existence flags in AVL tree nodes.

Performance improvements:
- Replaced UncheckedConverter approach with direct bit manipulation
- Achieved ~4-5x performance improvement (from ~71μs to ~17μs)
- Direct bit operations: ((value >> N) & One) != Zero

Changes:
- Updated GetLeftIsChildValue() and GetRightIsChildValue() methods
- Added comprehensive benchmarks comparing all approaches
- Maintained backward compatibility - all tests pass
- Added detailed performance analysis documentation

The direct bit manipulation approach outperformed:
1. UncheckedConverter (previous): ~71μs → ~17μs
2. EqualityComparer approaches: ~91-98μs
3. Unchecked variants showed minimal benefit

🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.ai/code)

Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
@konard konard changed the title [WIP] Determine which solution gives best performance Optimize AVL tree child bit checking performance (Issue #85) Sep 14, 2025
@konard konard marked this pull request as ready for review September 14, 2025 07:12
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Determine which solution gives best performance

2 participants