Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Fix incorrect paper links #1

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Jun 19, 2024
Merged

Fix incorrect paper links #1

Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
3 commits
Select commit Hold shift + click to select a range
fcb63e0
Fix incorrect links to papers
reuank Jun 18, 2024
d3f2c1c
Fix incorrect paper link
reuank Jun 18, 2024
b695b6a
Fix incorrect paper links
reuank Jun 18, 2024
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
4 changes: 2 additions & 2 deletions README.md
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -139,9 +139,9 @@ _Let LLMs self-correct their deliberation._

_Methods for analysing LLM deliberation and assessing reasoning quality._

- 🎓👩‍💻 Comprehensive LLM-based reasoning analytics that breaks texts down into individual reasons. "DCR-Consistency: Divide-Conquer-Reasoning for Consistency Evaluation and Improvement of Large Language Models." 2024-01-04. [[>paper](https://arxiv.org/abs/2304.10703)] [[>code](https://github.com/intuit-ai-research/DCR-consistency)]
- 🎓👩‍💻 Comprehensive LLM-based reasoning analytics that breaks texts down into individual reasons. "DCR-Consistency: Divide-Conquer-Reasoning for Consistency Evaluation and Improvement of Large Language Models." 2024-01-04. [[>paper](https://arxiv.org/abs/2401.02132)] [[>code](https://github.com/intuit-ai-research/DCR-consistency)]
- 🎓🤗 Highly performant, open LLM (T5-based) for inference verification. "Minds versus Machines: Rethinking Entailment Verification with Language Models." 2024-02-06. [[>paper](https://arxiv.org/abs/2402.03686)] [[>model](soumyasanyal/entailment-verifier-xxl)]
- 🎓👩‍💻 Test dataset for CoT evaluators. "A Chain-of-Thought Is as Strong as Its Weakest Link: A Benchmark for Verifiers of Reasoning Chains." 2023-11-23. [[>paper](https://arxiv.org/abs/2304.10703)] [[>dataset](https://huggingface.co/datasets/google/reveal)]
- 🎓👩‍💻 Test dataset for CoT evaluators. "A Chain-of-Thought Is as Strong as Its Weakest Link: A Benchmark for Verifiers of Reasoning Chains." 2023-11-23. [[>paper](https://arxiv.org/abs/2402.00559)] [[>dataset](https://huggingface.co/datasets/google/reveal)]
- 🎓👩‍💻 Framework for evaluating reasoning chains by viewing them as informal proofs that derive the final answer. "ReCEval: Evaluating Reasoning Chains via Correctness and Informativeness." 2023-11-23. [[>paper](https://arxiv.org/abs/2304.10703)] [[>code](https://github.com/archiki/ReCEval)]
- 🎓 GPT-4 is 5x better at predicting whether math reasoning is correct than GPT-3.5. "Challenge LLMs to Reason About Reasoning: A Benchmark to Unveil Cognitive Depth in LLMs." 2023-12-28. [[>paper](https://arxiv.org/abs/2312.17080)]
- 🎓 Minimalistic GPT-4 prompts for assessing reasoning quality. "SocREval: Large Language Models with the Socratic Method for Reference-Free Reasoning Evaluation." 2023-09-29. [[>paper](https://arxiv.org/abs/2310.00074)] [[>code](https://github.com/facebookresearch/ParlAI/tree/main/projects/roscoe#meta-evaluation)]
Expand Down
Loading