Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat(env-check): support Talos Linux #3240

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Oct 29, 2024

Conversation

c3y1huang
Copy link
Contributor

@c3y1huang c3y1huang commented Oct 29, 2024

Which issue(s) this PR fixes:

Issue longhorn/longhorn#9558

What this PR does / why we need it:

longhorn/longhorn#9558 (comment)

Special notes for your reviewer:

None

Additional documentation or context

longhorn/longhorn#7571

longhorn/longhorn-9558

Signed-off-by: Chin-Ya Huang <chin-ya.huang@suse.com>
@c3y1huang c3y1huang self-assigned this Oct 29, 2024
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Oct 29, 2024

Walkthrough

The changes in the pull request enhance the NodeController in controller/node_controller.go to support Talos Linux. A new function, syncPackagesInstalledTalosLinux, is introduced to validate required packages for Talos environments. The existing checkModulesLoadedByConfigFile function is modified to improve kernel module checks, including namespace handling and support for gzipped kernel configurations. Additionally, the syncNFSClientVersion function is updated to align with these changes, ensuring proper validation of NFS client versions.

Changes

File Change Summary
controller/node_controller.go - Added syncPackagesInstalledTalosLinux method for Talos package validation.
- Updated checkModulesLoadedByConfigFile method to include namespace handling and support gzipped files.
- Updated syncNFSClientVersion method to accommodate new namespace parameter.

Assessment against linked issues

Objective Addressed Explanation
Support for Talos environment checks (issue #9558)
Validate required packages for Talos (issue #9558)
Improve error handling for modules and packages (issue #9558)

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

longhorn/longhorn-9558

Signed-off-by: Chin-Ya Huang <chin-ya.huang@suse.com>
Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (2)
controller/node_controller.go (2)

1086-1086: Typo in comment: "packagesl" should be "packages"

Please correct the typo in the comment on line 1086.


1191-1193: Consider using os.ErrNotExist instead of unix.ENOENT for portability

Using os.ErrNotExist in error handling enhances portability across different operating systems.

📜 Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 5d4d409 and 20f3413.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • controller/node_controller.go (8 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
controller/node_controller.go (1)

963-965: Talos Linux support added correctly

The addition of Talos Linux support in the syncPackagesInstalled function is implemented appropriately.

controller/node_controller.go Show resolved Hide resolved
@c3y1huang
Copy link
Contributor Author

Test result:

  - lastProbeTime: ""
    lastTransitionTime: "2024-10-29T03:39:22Z"
    message: All required packages [cryptsetup dmsetup nfs-common iscsiadm] are installed
      on node ip-10-0-28-138
    reason: ""
    status: "True"
    type: RequiredPackages

Screenshot from 2024-10-29 14-27-39

@c3y1huang c3y1huang requested review from a team, mantissahz and derekbit October 29, 2024 06:30
Copy link
Member

@derekbit derekbit left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM. The codes are elegant.

@derekbit derekbit merged commit b8af720 into longhorn:master Oct 29, 2024
10 checks passed
@c3y1huang c3y1huang deleted the 9558-talos-node-environment-check branch October 29, 2024 07:20
@derekbit
Copy link
Member

@mergify backport v1.7.x

Copy link

mergify bot commented Oct 29, 2024

backport v1.7.x

✅ Backports have been created

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants