Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix: rename cli parameter dataEngine to data-engine #431

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 11, 2025

Conversation

derekbit
Copy link
Member

Which issue(s) this PR fixes:

Issue longhorn/longhorn#7355

What this PR does / why we need it:

Special notes for your reviewer:

Additional documentation or context

Longhorn 7355

Signed-off-by: Derek Su <derek.su@suse.com>
@derekbit derekbit self-assigned this Jan 11, 2025
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Jan 11, 2025

Walkthrough

The pull request modifies the command-line interface (CLI) flags in the app/cmd/server.go file. Specifically, the data engine flag has been renamed from dataEngine to data-engine. This change impacts both the flag declaration and its usage within the Action function, ensuring that the DataEngine field of the volume.Volume struct is populated using the new flag name.

Changes

File Change Summary
app/cmd/server.go - Renamed CLI flag from dataEngine to data-engine
- Updated flag usage in Action function to use new flag name

Assessment against linked issues

Objective Addressed Explanation
Support encrypted v2 volumes [#7355] The flag rename does not directly address encryption support or volume versioning

Note: The current changes appear to be a minor CLI flag modification and do not substantively relate to the feature request for encrypted v2 volumes. The implementation details for encryption support are not evident in this pull request.

Finishing Touches

  • 📝 Generate Docstrings (Beta)

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@derekbit
Copy link
Member Author

@mergify backport v1.8.x

Copy link

mergify bot commented Jan 11, 2025

backport v1.8.x

✅ Backports have been created

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

📜 Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 48756d0 and 13f8e29.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • app/cmd/server.go (2 hunks)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (2)
  • GitHub Check: Build binaries
  • GitHub Check: Summary
🔇 Additional comments (1)
app/cmd/server.go (1)

94-94: LGTM! Consistent update of the flag usage.

The flag usage is correctly updated to match the new name.

Comment on lines +39 to 42
Name: "data-engine",
Usage: "The volume data engine",
Required: true,
},
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Codebase verification

Breaking change needs documentation

The CLI flag rename from "dataEngine" to "data-engine" is currently undocumented. The codebase lacks:

  • CLI documentation in README.md
  • A changelog file to track breaking changes
  • Migration guide for users

Please:

  1. Create a changelog file to document breaking changes
  2. Add CLI documentation to README.md
  3. Document the flag rename and provide migration steps for users
🔗 Analysis chain

LGTM! But this is a breaking change.

The renaming from "dataEngine" to "data-engine" improves consistency with kebab-case CLI naming conventions. However, this is a breaking change that will affect existing users.

Please ensure this change is:

  1. Documented in the changelog
  2. Communicated to users
  3. Released with appropriate version bump

Run this script to check for any documentation that needs updating:

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for any documentation files that might reference the old flag name
rg -t md -t txt "dataEngine" 

Length of output: 28


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for documentation files
echo "=== Documentation files ==="
fd -e md -e txt -e rst -e adoc

echo -e "\n=== Searching for both flag variations ==="
# Search for both old and new flag names in all text files
rg -l "data.?engine" --type-add 'text:*.{md,txt,rst,adoc}' -t text

echo -e "\n=== Checking for changelog ==="
fd -i changelog

Length of output: 4763

Copy link
Contributor

@mantissahz mantissahz left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM, I'm modifying and testing longhorn-manager part
Modified and Tested.

@derekbit derekbit merged commit c0bdb9f into longhorn:master Jan 11, 2025
9 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants