Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Support gokart 1.4.0 with some fixed tests #41

Open
wants to merge 10 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

maronuu
Copy link
Collaborator

@maronuu maronuu commented Jun 14, 2024

Support the latest gokart 1.4.0 in kannon.

Changes

  • Add a dependency to gokart 1.4.0
  • Remove python 3.8 support, and add 3.12 support, along with gokart 1.4.0
  • Run lock again to fix build errors in numpy, pyarrow, and etc. That makes the diff in poery.lock large.
  • Add python 3.12 test and remove python 3.8 test in CI workflow
  • Minor fix in some test cases.

@maronuu maronuu marked this pull request as ready for review June 14, 2024 09:23
@maronuu maronuu requested a review from Hi-king June 14, 2024 09:23
Copy link
Member

@kitagry kitagry left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM!

@@ -27,7 +27,9 @@ isort = "^5.7"
yapf = ">=0.32"
toml = "*"
mypy = "^1.2.0"
pandas-stubs = "^1.5.3.230321"
pandas-stubs = "*"
pyyaml = "6.0.1"
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

[question]

new dependency...?

Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

 name = "pyyaml"
-version = "6.0"
+version = "6.0.1"

seems not new.

6.0.0 has any issue? I expect we don't need to pin but just require newer than 6.0.1

Suggested change
pyyaml = "6.0.1"
pyyaml = ">=6.0.1"

@@ -50,9 +52,6 @@ ignore_patterns = [
line_length = 160

[tool.mypy]
strict = true
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@mamo3gr

need to remove strict ?

Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@yokomotod
Should it be redirected to @maronuu ?

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

kusa

Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

😅 😅 😅

Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Putting that aside, I srtongly disaggree with removing the strict setting.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants